首页> 外文OA文献 >Balancing the educator's rights to fair labour practices and to strike with the right to education
【2h】

Balancing the educator's rights to fair labour practices and to strike with the right to education

机译:平衡教育者对公平劳动实践的权利,并打击受教育的权利

摘要

This treatise investigates the potential for law (including courts and tribunals) to intervene and act as a lever for the protection and advancement of the rights of the child including the right to basic education. The dissertation critically explores the debate on the educator‟s right to strike and fair labour practices and the child‟s right to education, by assessing the rights and liberties, which accrue to educators and the child (learners) in terms of existing law. The South African Constitution has made specific provision for the protection of the rights of children and the rights of educators and these rights are fundamental to the development of a society in transition. The vexed question that arises is whether these rights can co-exist in a society that has inherited a legacy of discrimination and inequality. The consequences of this legacy have resulted in the rights of educators competing with those of learners. The normalisation of the balance of these opposite rights is the challenge that lies ahead and this process will require intervention of all stakeholders rather than purely legislative intervention. This dissertation recommends a consensus-based approach, which is the most appropriate solution to balance the rights of educators with this of the child‟s right to education, as opposed to a declaration of the education sector as an essential service. It further proposes the establishment of a more structured and organised forum / institution and its sole purpose would be to deal with the individual or collective rights of educators that compete with the rights of learners.
机译:本论文研究了法律(包括法院和法庭)进行干预的可能性,并作为保护和增进儿童权利(包括基础教育权)的杠杆。论文通过评估现行法律赋予教育者和儿童(学习者)的权利和自由,批判性地探讨了关于教育者的罢工权和公平劳动惯例以及儿童的受教育权的辩论。 《南非宪法》为保护儿童权利和教育者权利做出了具体规定,这些权利对于转型社会的发展至关重要。出现的令人烦恼的问题是,在继承了歧视和不平等传统的社会中,这些权利是否可以共存。这种遗产的后果导致教育者的权利与学习者的权利竞争。这些对立权利平衡的正常化是摆在面前的挑战,这一过程将需要所有利益攸关方的干预,而不是纯粹的立法干预。本文建议采用一种基于共识的方法,这是平衡教育者权利与儿童受教育权之间关系的最适当解决方案,而不是将教育部门宣布为一项基本服务。它还建议建立一个更有条理,更有组织的论坛/机构,其唯一目的是处理与学习者权利竞争的教育者的个人或集体权利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Govender Mahalingum;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号