首页> 外文OA文献 >The efficacy of agricultural subsidies as social protection measures in rural Malawi
【2h】

The efficacy of agricultural subsidies as social protection measures in rural Malawi

机译:农业补贴作为马拉维农村社会保护措施的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Social protection measures are poverty reduction interventions implemented to assist in reducing poverty shocks of communities. This study considered the Farm Input Subsidy Programme (FISP) that has been implemented in Malawi with the aim of reducing poverty amongst subsistence farmers by providing them with subsidized farm inputs. The study was conducted in the rural area of Lilongwe District, under Traditional Authority Kabudula. The study mainly focussed on the outcomes of implementing the FISP and it entails whether or not the poverty reduction intervention is really achieving its goals. Thus, the study greatly evaluates the effectiveness of subsidizing farm inputs in reducing poverty amongst households in rural communities characterised by subsistence farming. This study was mainly qualitative in nature and data was collected through interviews and Focus Group Discussions. Some quantitative data for specific trends of national indicators was collected through document. Mainly, content analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data and descriptive statistical analysis with the aid of Microsoft Excel was engaged to analyse the quantitative data. The study found that that FISP assist in household food security only in the short term. Among the reasons cited, the package size received by households has become smaller with sharing tendencies that have been devised to help households that do not receive the inputs or qualify to receive them. This practice is compromising the agricultural productivity in terms of quantities as it lasts only in the short-term before the next harvest. When households’ food reserves are depleted, households become food insecure and poverty sets in again. The study thus reveals that FISP implementation is not operating as a sustainable programme as its intended goal is not being achieved in the long-term. The study also found that coupled with the fact that there is no clear policy guidelines on graduation and that there is continued benefitting of the same beneficiaries, FISP is nowhere close to its phasing-out stage in social protection perspective.
机译:社会保护措施是旨在帮助减轻社区的贫困冲击的减贫干预措施。这项研究考虑了在马拉维实施的农场投入补贴计划(FISP),其目的是通过为获得补贴的农场投入向自给自足的农民减少贫困。这项研究是在传统权力机构Kabudula领导下的利隆圭地区的农村地区进行的。该研究主要集中于实施FISP的成果,它涉及减贫干预措施是否真正实现了其目标。因此,该研究极大地评估了补贴农业投入以减少以自给农业为特征的农村社区家庭贫困的有效性。这项研究本质上是定性的,数据是通过访谈和焦点小组讨论收集的。通过文件收集了一些国家指标具体趋势的定量数据。主要使用内容分析法对定性数据进行分析,并借助Microsoft Excel进行描述性统计分析以分析定量数据。研究发现,FISP仅在短期内有助于家庭粮食安全。在上述原因中,家庭收到的包裹规模随着共享趋势的发展而变小,这种趋势旨在帮助那些没有收到投入或没有资格获得投入的家庭。这种作法在数量上损害了农业生产力,因为它仅在下一次收获之前的短期内持续存在。当家庭的粮食储备枯竭时,家庭将变得粮食不安全,贫困将再次陷入。因此,该研究表明,FISP的实施并不能作为一项可持续计划,因为长期没有实现其预期目标。该研究还发现,再加上没有关于毕业的明确政策指南,并且相同的受益者仍在继续受益,FISP在社会保护角度上还远未达到其逐步淘汰阶段。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chikafa Kondwani Watson;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号