首页> 外文OA文献 >Commodity fetishism and domination: the contributions of Marx, Lukács, Horkheimer, Adorno and Bourdieu
【2h】

Commodity fetishism and domination: the contributions of Marx, Lukács, Horkheimer, Adorno and Bourdieu

机译:商品拜物教和统治:马克思,卢卡奇,霍克海默,阿多诺和布迪厄的贡献

摘要

This thesis seeks to trace domination theory back to the influential work done by Marx on commodity fetishism. Marx's work proves to be an original account of domination that explains how the dominated many accept the rule of the privileged few. The theory of commodity fetishism develops the idea that individuals come to adopt beliefs that bolster and reproduce the status quo of capitalism. For Marx, the way that individuals experience capitalism is different from the way that it actually works because, in fact, lived experience is actually false. Oppression, inequality and exploitation are thus hidden and the main source of conflict between the oppressed many and the privileged few is obscured. I seek to develop this insight of Marx's into a more comprehensive account of how dominating capitalism self maintains. Lukács' theory of reification explains how capitalism has become all-embracing because capitalism has developed its own type of rationality. This specific rationality shapes thought, which in turn, generates false beliefs that favour the continuation of the status quo. Horkheimer and Adorno argue that capitalism extends its influence by means of its deep involvement in modern culture. Today, culture has become an massive industry which inculcates the logic and principles of capitalism into individuals. For these theorists, capitalism has penetrated all areas of life; experience, knowledge and thought have become extensions of capitalism itself. Marx, Lukács, Horkheimer and Adorno give accounts of how false beliefs are put into practice. Hence the importance of the work of Bourdieu. Bourdieu's theory of distinction describes how the status quo in capitalism is maintained by the behaviour of individuals through their daily acts of consumption. I argue that the consumption of commodities reproduces the status quo in two ways: firstly, establishing an upper-class which takes the lead in patterns of consumption, and, secondly, by creating a middle class that follows its example. Finally, I relate Bourdieu's insights to the theories of Marx, Lukács, Horkheimer and Adorno and Bourdieu in order to arrive at a more inclusive account of how.
机译:本文试图将统治理论追溯到马克思在商品拜物教方面所做的有影响的工作。马克思的著作被证明是统治的原始记录,它解释了被统治的多数人如何接受特权少数的规则。商品拜物教理论提出了这样一种观念,即个人开始接受能够支持和再现资本主义现状的信念。对于马克思来说,个人体验资本主义的方式与它实际起作用的方式是不同的,因为实际上,经验是错误的。因此,压迫,不平等和剥削被隐藏起来,被压迫者与少数特权者之间冲突的主要根源被遮盖了。我试图将对马克思的这种洞察力发展成为对资本主义自我维持方式的更全面的阐述。卢卡奇的质化理论解释了资本主义如何变得无所不包,因为资本主义发展了自己的理性类型。这种特定的理性塑造了思想,而思想又反过来产生了错误的信念,有利于维持现状。霍克海默(Horkheimer)和阿多诺(Adorno)认为,资本主义通过对现代文化的深入参与来扩大其影响力。今天,文化已成为一个庞大的产业,将资本主义的逻辑和原则灌输给个人。对于这些理论家来说,资本主义已经渗透到生活的各个领域。经验,知识和思想已成为资本主义本身的延伸。马克思,卢卡奇,霍克海默和阿多诺阐述了如何将错误的信念付诸实践。因此,布迪厄工作的重要性。布迪厄的区别理论描述了个人如何通过日常消费行为来维持资本主义的现状。我认为,商品的消费通过两种方式再现了现状:首先,建立上层阶级领导消费模式;其次,通过建立一个遵循其榜样的中产阶级。最后,我将布尔迪厄的见解与马克思,卢卡奇,霍克海默,阿多诺和布尔迪厄的理论联系起来,以便对方法进行更全面的论述。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lloyd Gareth;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 16:25:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号