首页> 外文OA文献 >The politics of transformation in South Africa: an evaluation of education policies and their implementation with particular reference to the Eastern Cape Province
【2h】

The politics of transformation in South Africa: an evaluation of education policies and their implementation with particular reference to the Eastern Cape Province

机译:南非的转型政治:对教育政策及其实施的评估,特别是东开普省

摘要

The post-apartheid government of South Africa has committed itself to achieving fundamental transformation of the education system. The government has adopted policies and measures that aimed to bring about the goals of equity and redress, and to enhance democracy and participation of all groups in development and decision making processes at all levels. It is acknowledged that the democratic government has accomplished a lot in education within this short period and has made numerous strides in enhancing equity, redress and social justice; providing high quality education for all the people of South Africa; bringing about democratisation and development; and enhancing effectiveness and efficiency. However, despite these apparent achievements, this study shows that there have been a number of setbacks and contradictions in the policies which have affected the process of bringing about fundamental changes and transformation in the education sector. The setbacks and contradictions resulted from factors which have affected the type of policies developed to transform the education sector. They also affected the formulation and implementation of the policies, thereby limiting the achievements of the goals of transformation agenda in education. Hence, this study examined the politics of transformation and change in the education sector by examining the type of policies that have been put in place; their formulation, implementation and outcome. The main research questions are: • What kind or type of policies have been put in place to transform the education sector? • How and by whom were the policies formulated? • How are these policies being implemented and what have been the outcomes of the process? Transformation and in particular the policy process is beset with continuous debate, contestation and struggle for the success of ideas and interests which are pursued by individual actors, groups and policy networks through the institutions. During these different stages policies are modified, constituted and reconstituted. As a result, they give rise to intended and unintended outcomes which are likely to support or contradict the objectives of those policies. Hence, the process cannot be explained using only one approach or theory. Therefore, this study has been situated in ideas, group and network and institutional approaches or theories to examine the factors that have affected education policies, their formulation and implementation and the overall transformation of education in South Africa. It contends that policy change and variation result from interaction of ideas and interests within patterns of group and policy networks and preset institutions. The study adopts qualitative interpretive methodology in order to question, understand and explain institutions; interests groups and ideas; socio economic and power relations involved in the process. It also appraises the framework for action. In addition to conducting literature review, unstructured interviews were held with officials from provincial and national Departments of Education, members of national and provincial legislatures, principals, teachers, members of school governing bodies, learners, Non-governmental organisations, Community based organisations, Faith based organisations, teachers’ and workers’ unions. Observations were made during meetings of school governing bodies. The study draws reference from the Eastern Cape Province between 1994 and 2002 and looks at the school level (Basic and Further Education levels). Reference is also made to selective policy instruments namely, the South African Schools Act (SASA) (1996), Curriculum 2005 and Norms and Standards for School Funding (1999). Overall, the findings of the study have shown that various factors have led to setbacks and contradictions in the policies that were adopted in education. They have also affected the formulation and implementation of the policies, hence exerting certain limitations on the achievements of the goals of transformation in education. The factors identified in the findings are the outcome of the negotiated settlement and subsequent changes made by the apartheid government in education before the 1994 elections; constraints and unequal participation of different groups in education policy development in various established structures and avenues; drawbacks in the implementation of education policies by decentralised structures and agents at various levels. This was exacerbated by lack of capacity, lack of adequate resources, lack of commitment and will among some of the civil servants coupled with corruption and mismanagement. The legacy of apartheid and the homeland governments, together with existing backlogs added another layer. Consequently, there were challenges in the economic policy which led to inadequate funding for education. The findings of this study show that competing ideas and interests advanced by groups and networks have impact on decision making, policy content and implementation. Therefore, some policies will reflect and maintain the interests of those individual actors, groups and policy networks that exerted most influence. The findings also reveal that institutional norms and rules, inadequate resources, lack of capacity and skilled human resources and economic environment, constrain decision making, policy content and implementation.
机译:南非的种族隔离后政府致力于实现教育体系的根本转变。政府已采取旨在实现公平和补救目标,并加强民主和所有群体参与各级发展和决策过程的政策和措施。众所周知,民主政府在短时间内取得了很多成就,并在促进平等,补救和社会正义方面取得了长足进步;为南非全体人民提供高质量的教育;实现民主化与发展;并提高效率和效率。然而,尽管取得了这些明显的成就,但这项研究表明,在政策上仍然存在许多挫折和矛盾,这些挫折和矛盾影响了教育部门实现根本变革和转型的过程。挫折和矛盾是由影响教育部门改革的政策类型的因素引起的。它们还影响了政策的制定和实施,从而限制了教育改革议程目标的实现。因此,本研究通过研究已经制定的政策类型,研究了教育领域的变革和变革政治。其制定,实施和结果。主要的研究问题是:•采取了何种类型或类型的政策来改变教育部门? •政策是如何制定的以及由谁制定的? •这些政策如何实施?流程的结果如何?变革,特别是政策过程中,不断有辩论,争执和斗争,以争取个人和行为者,团体和政策网络通过机构所追求的思想和利益的成功。在这些不同阶段中,将对政策进行修改,构成和重构。结果,它们产生了可能支持或矛盾这些政策目标的预期和非预期结果。因此,不能仅使用一种方法或理论来解释该过程。因此,本研究以思想,群体和网络以及制度方法或理论为基础,以研究影响教育政策,其制定和实施以及南非教育整体转型的因素。它认为,政策的变化和变化是由群体和政策网络以及预设机构内部的思想和利益的相互作用导致的。本研究采用定性解释方法论来质疑,理解和解释制度。利益集团和想法;这个过程涉及社会经济和权力关系。它还评估了行动框架。除进行文献审查外,还与省和国家教育部门的官员,国家和省立法机关的成员,校长,教师,学校管理机构的成员,学习者,非政府组织,社区组织,信仰组织进行了非结构化访谈。总部组织,教师和工人工会。在学校管理机构会议期间进行了观察。该研究从1994年至2002年间从东开普省(Eastern Cape Province)吸取了参考,并考察了学校级别(基础和继续教育级别)。还提到了选择性的政策工具,即《南非学校法》(SASA)(1996),《 2005课程》和《学校资助规范和标准》(1999)。总体而言,研究结果表明,各种因素导致了教育政策中的挫折和矛盾。它们也影响了政策的制定和实施,因此对实现教育改革目标的实现施加了某些限制。调查结果中确定的因素是谈判解决的结果以及种族隔离政府在1994年选举之前对教育的后续变动;在各种既定的结构和途径中,不同群体在教育政策制定方面的制约和不平等参与;各级权力下放机构和代理人实施教育政策的弊端。缺乏能力,缺乏足够的资源,缺乏公务员的决心和意愿以及腐败和管理不善,使情况更加恶化。种族隔离制度和国土政府的遗产,加上现有的积压案件,又增加了一层。因此,经济政策面临挑战,导致教育经费不足。这项研究的结果表明,团体和网络提出的相互竞争的思想和利益对决策有影响,政策内容和实施。因此,某些政策将反映并维护发挥最大影响力的个体行为者,团体和政策网络的利益。调查结果还表明,机构规范和规则,资源不足,能力不足以及熟练的人力资源和经济环境会限制决策,政策内容和实施。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rembe Symphorosa Wilibald;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号