首页> 外文OA文献 >Livestock, rural livelihoods and rural development interventions in the Eastern Cape: case studies of Chris Hani, Alfred Nzo and Amathole district municipalities
【2h】

Livestock, rural livelihoods and rural development interventions in the Eastern Cape: case studies of Chris Hani, Alfred Nzo and Amathole district municipalities

机译:东开普省的牲畜,农村生计和农村发展干预:Chris Hani,alfred Nzo和amathole地区市的案例研究

摘要

This study explores how livestock in rural communities were accessed, used as livelihoods portfolios and how off-farm activities and portfolios such as social grants, support from family members and employment assisted the rural poor to build their asset base. Empirical data was collected from 26 villages in the three districts. In particular the study examines firstly, the nature of rural poverty in these villages in the three districts and how households with and without livestock (cattle, sheep, goats, dogs, pigs, cats, ducks, horses and donkeys) used livestock local knowledge to sustain a living. Secondly it explores how the local government and related rural development agencies, intervened in livestock production and the thesis highlights the problematic nature of these interventions, and the implications this has for the form and nature of livestock ownership and use in relation to rural livelihoods. Arising from this, the thesis thirdly explores Ruliv‟s through concrete case studies, the challenges, constraints and implications of a pre-dominant top-down approach to rural development. Contrary to this approach, the study illustrates, through the Rhoxeni case study, the potential effectiveness of a „bottom-up‟ actor oriented approach to rural development. Fourthly, the study explores how local government initiatives intervened in the development of a rural livestock project in Alfred Nzo District Municipality through the Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Programme Goat Project. Here iv the concerns of „commercialisation‟ of livestock production are explored and the thesis points to the implications that the exclusion of social and cultural meanings of livestock have for assumed paths of commercialisation and its associations with development. Fifthly the study explores the potentiality of emerging black commercial farmers who had acquired large areas of agricultural land through local government interventions (Land Redistribution Agricultural Development) but who lacked further support and capacity to transform themselves into commercial farmers. The thesis concludes that their livestock and crop farming activities remained more subsistence and livelihood based, than any transition to expected technical market oriented commercial farming. Overall, the thesis argues that while local government planning for rural development prioritised commercial agriculture as the basis of rural development and the key mechanism of rural poverty alleviation in developmental policies (PGDP, IDP, LED), rural poverty has actually been deepening. In this context, the study argues that the value of livestock to the rural poor lies „outside‟ of its assumed economic value and is more firmly and determinedly located in its social meanings and values, despite these significant levels of material poverty. This has major implications for understanding livelihoods, engaging livestock agency, defining farming and what it means to be a „farmer‟ and engaging with prevalent understandings and practices directed at rural development.
机译:这项研究探讨了如何获取农村社区的牲畜,将其用作生计资产,以及农业活动和资产组合(如社会补助金,家庭成员的支持和就业)如何帮助农村贫困人口建立资产基础。从三个地区的26个村庄收集了经验数据。特别是,该研究首先考察了三个地区这些村庄中农村贫困的性质,以及有无牲畜的家庭(牛,羊,山羊,狗,猪,猫,鸭,马和驴)如何利用牲畜当地知识来维持生计。其次,它探讨了地方政府和相关的农村发展机构如何干预畜牧生产,并且论文着重指出了这些干预措施的问题性质,以及这对与农村生计有关的牲畜所有权和使用形式和性质的影响。因此,本文通过具体的案例研究,对鲁利夫的研究进行了第三次探讨,探讨了自上而下的主要方法对农村发展的挑战,制约因素和启示。与这种方法相反,该研究通过Rhoxeni案例研究说明了“自下而上”的面向参与者的乡村发展方法的潜在有效性。第四,研究探索了地方政府如何通过综合农村可持续发展计划山羊项目干预阿尔弗雷德·恩佐区市的农村畜牧项目的发展。 iv在此探讨了畜牧生产“商业化”的问题,论文指出了排除牲畜的社会和文化含义对假定的商业化道路及其与发展的联系的含义。第五,该研究探讨了新兴的黑人商业农民的潜力,这些黑人通过地方政府的干预措施(土地再分配农业发展)获得了大面积的农业用地,但他们缺乏进一步的支持和能力,无法将自己转变为商业农民。论文的结论是,与向预期的以技术市场为导向的商业化农业的任何过渡相比,他们的牲畜和农作物种植活动仍以生存和生计为基础。总体而言,本文认为,尽管地方政府对农村发展的计划将商业农业作为农村发展的基础,并作为发展政策(PGDP,IDP,LED)中农村扶贫的关键机制,但农村贫困实际上正在加深。在这种情况下,研究认为,尽管物质贫困水平很高,但畜牧业对农村贫困人口的价值“超出”了其假定的经济价值,并且更加牢固和确定地位于其社会意义和价值中。这对理解生计,聘请畜牧机构,定义农业及其对“农民”的意义以及针对农村发展的普遍理解和实践具有重大意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Phiri Christopher;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号