首页> 外文OA文献 >Electricity generation, transmission and distribution policy: a comparative study of Nigeria (1960-2011) and South Africa (1960-2011)
【2h】

Electricity generation, transmission and distribution policy: a comparative study of Nigeria (1960-2011) and South Africa (1960-2011)

机译:发电,输电和配电政策:尼日利亚(1960-2011)和南非(1960-2011)的比较研究

摘要

The electric power policies in Nigeria and South Africa are considered the governments’ intention to provide quality and affordable electricity to the people. A comparative study on the electric power policies focuses on the similarities and differences in the policy approaches, the policy issues that affect electrification, and the impact of the policy issues in achieving the goal of universal access to quality and affordable electricity power in both countries. The methodological approach allows for an in depth textual study on the electric power policy documents in both countries. In Nigeria, the government intends to address the massive demand-supply imbalance and achieve the goal of electrification through reforms that focus on private sector-led growth in the sub-sector. In South Africa, the identification of electrification as a public problem by the post apartheid government leads to an integrated policy framework that focuses on balancing economic concerns with social and environmental considerations. The study identifies electricity provision as a social welfare responsibility of the governments in both countries and examines the policy issues in the context of public welfare. In Nigeria, the policy issues are found to be self serving and not in line with sustainable public interest, given the socio-economic challenges. As a result they, exert less impact on achieving the goal of universal access to quality and affordable electricity in the country. In South Africa, good governance in the sub-sector has enabled the identification of policy issues in line with sustainable public interests of social equity, poverty alleviation and environmental sustainability; and government using public administration agencies to play a key role in service delivery. Recommendations of the study mainly derive from the South African experience on electrification, and are intended to offer some policy-lessons to Nigeria in the sub-sector. The study contributes to new knowledge in the discipline of public administration by opening up new vistas for a comparative analysis of electric power policy issues in both countries in the context of public welfare. Besides, a comparative study on electrification in Nigeria and South Africa from a policy angle contributes to the existing knowledge base in the discipline.
机译:尼日利亚和南非的电力政策被认为是政府为人民提供优质和负担得起的电力的意图。对电力政策的比较研究集中于两国在政策方法,影响电气化的政策问题以及政策问题对实现两国普遍获得优质和负担得起的电力这一目标的影响方面的异同。该方法论方法允许对两国电力政策文件进行深入的文本研究。在尼日利亚,政府打算通过侧重于私营部门主导的子行业增长的改革来解决巨大的供需不平衡,并实现电气化的目标。在南非,种族隔离制度后的政府将电气化确定为公共问题,导致了一个综合政策框架,该框架着重于平衡经济问题与社会和环境因素之间的关系。该研究将电力供应确定为两国政府的社会福利责任,并在公共福利背景下研究了政策问题。在尼日利亚,鉴于社会经济挑战,发现政策问题是自利的,与可持续的公共利益不符。结果,它们对实现该国普遍获得优质和负担得起的电力的目标的影响较小。在南非,该分部门的善政使人们能够根据社会公平,减贫和环境可持续性的可持续公共利益来确定政策问题;政府利用公共管理机构在提供服务方面发挥关键作用。该研究的建议主要来自南非的电气化经验,旨在为该子行业的尼日利亚提供一些政策课程。这项研究通过在公共福利的背景下开放新的视野来对两国电力政策问题进行比较分析,为公共管理领域的新知识做出了贡献。此外,从政策角度对尼日利亚和南非的电气化进行比较研究,有助于该学科的现有知识基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Okafor Chukwuemeka;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号