首页> 外文OA文献 >Cultural villages inherited tradition and 'African culture': a case study of Mgwali Cultural Village in the Eastern Cape
【2h】

Cultural villages inherited tradition and 'African culture': a case study of Mgwali Cultural Village in the Eastern Cape

机译:文化村继承传统与“非洲文化” - 以东开普省文化村为例

摘要

A growing number of studies concerning cultural villages have in most instances tended to focus on the cultural village as almost legitimately self-explanatory and have not been particularly concerned with either how a particular history is produced in and through these villages, or with the ways that particular discourses and practices associated with heritage, tourism, community and development intersect in the production of these meanings. As such Mgwali Cultural Village seemed to promise something different in the form of cultural villages. The thesis argues that Mgwali Cultural Village is unique in the history of cultural villages in that it moves away from presenting a cultural village in Africa as tribal and primitive. It does this by opening up spaces for other aspects such as Christianity and resistance politics, story of Tiyo Soga rather than focusing and confining itself only to aspects cultural portraying Africans and traditional. It is imperative that cultural villages ought to be understood within a broader framework and context where its definition and presentation is not trapped into an anthropological paradigm thinking of exploring and discovering something new by tourists which they are not familiar with. However, the thesis also argues that much as Mgwali Cultural Village promised something new from the known through depiction of other aspects, those histories seem to be absent or marginal at the Cultural Village. The only aspects that are fore grounded are traditions and culture thus freezing Mgwali as a village and its people in time as if they have not evolved and its cultures are static and not dynamic. The thesis therefore explores all those contradictions, silences, or absence thereof of other stories and histories.
机译:关于文化村的越来越多的研究在大多数情况下倾向于将文化村几乎合法地自我解释为重点,而不是特别关注这些村中和通过这些村如何产生特定的历史,或者不关心这些村落的方式。与遗产,旅游业,社区和发展相关的特定论述和实践在这些含义的产生中相交。因此,姆格瓦利文化村似乎承诺在文化村的形式上有所不同。本文认为,姆格瓦利文化村在文化村的历史上是独一无二的,因为它不再将非洲的文化村呈现为部落和原始的文化村。它通过为基督教和抵抗政治等其他方面开辟空间来做到这一点,而不仅仅是将注意力集中和局限于描绘非洲人和传统的文化方面。当务之急是,应该在一个更广阔的框架和背景下理解文化村,其定义和表述不应陷入人类学范式中,以探索和发现他们不熟悉的游客的新事物。然而,论文还指出,就像姆格瓦利文化村通过对其他方面的描述,从已知的知识中承诺了新的东西一样,文化村的历史似乎并不存在或处于边缘。唯一可以扎根的方面是传统和文化,从而使姆格瓦利冻结为一个村庄及其人民,就好像他们没有进化一样,其文化是静态的而不是动态的。因此,本文探讨了其他故事和历史的所有矛盾,沉默或缺失。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bovana Solomzi Victor;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 16:25:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号