首页> 外文OA文献 >The obligation of non-discrimination under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the agreement on Trade-related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS): a developmental perspective
【2h】

The obligation of non-discrimination under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the agreement on Trade-related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS): a developmental perspective

机译:“服务贸易总协定”(GaTs)中的不歧视义务和与贸易有关的知识产权协议(TRIps):发展前景

摘要

The non-discrimination obligation has existed since the twelfth century. It has been practiced since then, changing from a conditional to unconditional form with the passage of time. It became firmly applied unconditionally at the multilateral level in 1947 after the formation of the GATT trading system upon which several countries based their trading relations. In 1995 when the WTO was formed, the underlying principles of the GATT 1947 became part of the WTO trading system, including the non-discrimination obligation. When countries join the WTO they automatically become subject to the non-discrimination obligation. The ever increasing value of services and trade in the value of intellectual property has necessitated a look at the fundamental principles of world trade that countries have to adhere to in their trade relations. Incidentally, countries are not at the same level economically, hence one of the purposes of the WTO is to facilitate development in developing countries. Accordingly, this requires different application and/or interpretation of these fundamental principles in different situations, depending on the development level of each Member country. Amongst the five principles that underlie the international trading system, the non-discrimination principle is the focus of this study. The sustainability of the entire economic relations between WTO Member countries is dependent upon their fair compliance with this obligation. The obligation is found in Articles II and XVII of the GATS and Articles 3 and 4 of the TRIPS. The Membership of the WTO is made up of developed and developing countries. As a result of the fundamental nature of the obligation it is imperative that the scope and interpretation of this obligation, as developed by WTO adjudicating bodies, be analysed to determine if the obligation’s application and/or interpretation satisfies the above fundamental object and purpose of the multilateral system of trade. The intention here is at all times to show the importance that the non-discrimination obligation carries in international economic and legal interactions and how non-observance of this obligation would negatively affect relations between Member countries of the WTO.
机译:自十二世纪以来就存在非歧视义务。此后一直在实践,随着时间的流逝从有条件的形式变为无条件的形式。在关贸总协定贸易体系形成后,它在多国一级得到了无条件的坚定应用,一些国家以其贸易关系为基础。在1995年WTO成立时,1947年关贸总协定的基本原则已成为WTO贸易体系的一部分,其中包括无歧视义务。各国加入世贸组织后,它们将自动承担无歧视义务。服务和知识产权价值贸易的价值不断增长,因此有必要研究各国在贸易关系中必须坚持的世界贸易基本原则。顺便说一下,国家在经济上不处于同一水平,因此,WTO的目的之一是促进发展中国家的发展。因此,这需要根据每个成员国的发展水平,在不同情况下对这些基本原则进行不同的应用和/或解释。在构成国际贸易体系的五项原则中,非歧视性原则是本研究的重点。世贸组织成员国之间整个经济关系的可持续性取决于它们对这一义务的公平遵守。该义务在《服贸总协定》第二条和第十七条以及《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》的第三条和第四条中可以找到。世贸组织的成员由发达国家和发展中国家组成。由于义务的基本性质,必须分析由WTO裁决机构制定的该义务的范围和解释,以确定该义务的适用和/或解释是否满足上述义务的基本目的和宗旨。多边贸易体系。这里的意图是随时表明不歧视义务在国际经济和法律互动中的重要性,以及不遵守这一义务将如何对世贸组织成员国之间的关系产生负面影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bidie Simphiwe Sincere;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号