首页> 外文OA文献 >Acacia Mearnsii debarking: comparing different debarking technologies in the KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga forestry regions of South Africa
【2h】

Acacia Mearnsii debarking: comparing different debarking technologies in the KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga forestry regions of South Africa

机译:acacia mearnsii剥皮:比较南非夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省和姆普马兰加林业区的不同剥皮技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Debarking of Acacia mearnsii in South Africa has been conducted using mainly manual systems. Labour shortages and reliability of these systems has caused interest in alternative systems that might be able to debark A. mearnsii. The aim of the research is to compare three mechanised debarking technologies used to debark A. mearnsii. Research trials were conducted on the Demuth, Hyena and Hypro debarkers that would form part of semi-mechanised harvesting systems. The debarking technologies were analysed and compared in terms of productivity per productive machine hour (PMH), debarking quality, system costs and the quality of the bark that was produced. Furthermore, the effect that tree volume, strippability and form have on each of the debarking technologies was determined. The debarking technologies were affected by each of the factors researched. Decreasing tree form had a negative effect on the productivity of each of the technologies. An increase in strippability class (strengthening wood-bark bond strength) caused a decrease in the productivity of each of the machines. An increasing tree volume had a positive effect on the productivity for the three debarking technologies. After the debarking had taken place, samples of bark were analysed at a laboratory to determine if it was acceptable for the processing facilities. Each of the debarking technologies produced bark of varying dimensions, but they were all found to be acceptable. The system costs of the three debarking technologies were compared to a manual system cost at tree volumes of 0.1m³, 0.15m³ and 0.2m³. The Demuth debarker had the best system cost for a tree size of 0.1m³, while the manual system was best for tree volumes 0.15m³ and 0.2m³. The Demuth, Hyena and manual system costs were very similar for each of the tree volumes, with the Hypro being a little higher.
机译:南非相思树的剥皮主要使用手动系统进行。这些系统的劳动力短缺和可靠性已引起人们对可能使A. mearnsii剥皮的替代系统的兴趣。该研究的目的是比较三种用于机械化A. mearnsii的机械化剥皮技术。在Demuth,Hyena和Hypro剥皮机上进行了研究试验,这些剥皮机将成为半机械收割系统的一部分。对剥皮技术进行了分析,并根据每生产机器小时的生产率(PMH),剥皮质量,系统成本和所生产的树皮质量进行了比较。此外,确定了树木的体积,可剥性和形态对每种剥皮技术的影响。剥皮技术受到研究的每个因素的影响。树形的减少对每种技术的生产率都有负面影响。可剥性等级的提高(加强木-树皮粘合强度)导致每台机器的生产率下降。树木数量的增加对三种剥皮技术的生产率产生了积极影响。剥皮后,在实验室对树皮样品进行分析,以确定其是否适合加工设备使用。每种剥皮技术都会产生不同尺寸的树皮,但是发现它们都是可以接受的。将这三种剥皮技术的系统成本与手动系统成本(树木体积为0.1m³,0.15m³和0.2m³)进行了比较。 Demuth剥皮机对于0.1m³的树木而言,系统成本最高,而手动系统对于0.15m³和0.2m³的树木而言成本最高。每个树体积的Demuth,Hyena和手动系统成本非常相似,而Hypro则略高一些。

著录项

  • 作者

    Eggers John Rolf;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号