首页> 外文OA文献 >A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing radiofrequency and mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation of varicose veins - final results of the Venefit versus Clarivein for varicose veins trial
【2h】

A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing radiofrequency and mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation of varicose veins - final results of the Venefit versus Clarivein for varicose veins trial

机译:一项多中心随机对照试验比较射频和机械闭塞化学辅助消融静脉曲张 - Venefit与Clarivein治疗静脉曲张试验的最终结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Endovenous thermal ablation has revolutionised varicose vein treatment. New non-thermal techniques such as mechanical occlusion chemically assisted endovenous ablation (MOCA) allow treatment of entire trunks with single anaesthetic injections. Previous non-randomised work has shown reduced pain post-operatively with MOCA. This study presents a multi-centre randomised controlled trial assessing the difference in pain during truncal ablation using MOCA and radiofrequency endovenous ablation (RFA) with six months' follow-up. METHODS: Patients undergoing local anaesthetic endovenous ablation for primary varicose veins were randomised to either MOCA or RFA. Pain scores using Visual Analogue Scale and number scale (0-10) during truncal ablation were recorded. Adjunctive procedures were completed subsequently. Pain after phlebectomy was not assessed. Patients were reviewed at one and six months with clinical scores, quality of life scores and duplex ultrasound assessment of the treated leg. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were recruited over a 21-month period from 240 screened. Patients in the MOCA group experienced significantly less maximum pain during the procedure by Visual Analogue Scale (MOCA median 15 mm (interquartile range 7-36 mm) versus RFA 34 mm (interquartile range 16-53 mm), p = 0.003) and number scale (MOCA median 3 (interquartile range 1-5) versus RFA 4 mm (interquartile range 3-6.5), p = 0.002). 'Average' pain scores were also significantly less in the MOCA group; 74% underwent simultaneous phlebectomy. Occlusion rates, clinical severity scores, disease specific and generic quality of life scores were similar between groups at one and six months. There were two deep vein thromboses, one in each group. CONCLUSION: Pain secondary to truncal ablation is less painful with MOCA than RFA with similar short-term technical, quality of life and safety outcomes.
机译:背景:静脉内热消融彻底改变了静脉曲张的治疗方法。新的非热技术,例如机械闭塞化学辅助静脉消融(MOCA),可通过单次麻醉剂注射治疗整个躯干。先前的非随机工作已显示MOCA术后疼痛减轻。这项研究提出了一项多中心的随机对照试验,使用MOCA和射频静脉消融(RFA)进行六个月的随访,评估了在消融过程中疼痛的疼痛差异。方法:对原发性静脉曲张进行局麻麻醉的患者随机分配至MOCA或RFA。记录了在消融过程中使用视觉模拟量表和数字量表(0-10)的疼痛评分。附属程序随后完成。未评估静脉摘除后的疼痛。在第一个月和第六个月对患者进行了临床评分,生活质量评分和接受治疗的双腿超声检查。结果:在总共21个月的时间内,共筛选了240名患者,共招募了170名患者。通过视觉模拟量表(MOCA中位值15 mm(四分位间距7-36 mm)与RFA 34 mm(四分位间距16-53 mm),p = 0.003)和数字量表,MOCA组的患者在手术过程中最大疼痛明显减少(MOCA中位数3(四分位数范围1-5)与RFA 4 mm(四分位数范围3-6.5),p = 0.002)。 MOCA组的“平均”疼痛评分也明显降低。 74%接受了同时静脉摘除术。两组在1个月和6个月时的阻塞率,临床严重性评分,疾病特异性和一般生活质量评分相似。有两次深静脉血栓形成,每组一个。结论:与短期射频消融术相似的短期技术,生活质量和安全性结局,与射频消融术相比,MOCA导致的继发性消融后的疼痛减轻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号