首页> 外文OA文献 >Public access to environmental information and participation in environmental decision-making: a Malaysian case study
【2h】

Public access to environmental information and participation in environmental decision-making: a Malaysian case study

机译:公众获取环境信息和参与环境决策:马来西亚案例研究

摘要

Access to information, access to public participation and access to justice are recognised as the pillars of sound environmental governance, and are at the heart of environmental democracy. Collectively referred to as “environmental access rights”, they are promoted under Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and form the core pillars of a legally binding international instrument known as the Aarhus Convention. Malaysia, a developing country that has undergone rapid change, is striving to achieve its development goals through “Vision 2020”, but still struggles to balance between the economic, social, and environmental aspects of its development. By implementing transformation programmes, the Malaysian Government is displaying efforts to transition its “government-knows-best” approach into one that is more transparent, accountable, inclusive and citizen-centric. However, the findings of this empirical, exploratory research indicate that public access to environmental information and participation in environmental decision-making remain limited in Malaysia. Furthermore, the author’s investigation into two scenarios that took place in the country: 1) The Rare Earth Controversy in Kuantan, and 2) The Major Floods of 2014/2015, identified examples of how deficits in access to environmental information and public participation in Malaysia’s current system of environmental governance could arguably exacerbate such situations, and may contribute to social unrest as well as lack of confidence in the Government. Drawing from evidence of the research findings, the author suggests that Malaysia could benefit from enhanced access to environmental information as well as public participation in environmental decision-making, and thus proposes a framework to help the country progress towards achieving this objective. This research breaks new ground as it reports on recent events and developments (or lack thereof) in an area of study that has been sparsely explored in Malaysia. It is also timely as the country still faces environmental deterioration and increasing public demands for improved Government transparency, accountability, and citizen engagement. It is hoped that the research work contained in this thesis will enrich the existing knowledge on the subject area of environmental governance, specifically environmental access rights, and contribute towards promoting good environmental governance and democracy in Malaysia, the ASEAN region, and across the world.
机译:获得信息,获得公众参与和诉诸司法是公认的健全环境治理的支柱,并且是环境民主的核心。它们被统称为“环境获取权”,是根据《关于环境与发展的里约宣言》原则10予以促进的,并构成了具有法律约束力的国际文书《奥尔胡斯公约》的核心支柱。马来西亚是一个经历了快速变化的发展中国家,正在努力通过“ 2020年愿景”实现其发展目标,但仍在平衡其发展的经济,社会和环境方面努力。通过实施转型计划,马来西亚政府正在努力将其“政府最了解”的方法转变为更加透明,负责,包容和以公民为中心的方法。然而,这项经验性,探索性研究的结果表明,马来西亚公众获取环境信息和参与环境决策的能力仍然有限。此外,作者对马来西亚发生的两种情况进行了调查:1)关丹的稀土争议,以及2)2014/2015年的大洪灾,确定了在马来西亚的环境中如何获取环境信息和公众参与不足的示例当前的环境治理体系无疑会加剧这种情况,并可能加剧社会动荡以及对政府的信心不足。作者利用研究结果的证据表明,马来西亚可以从增加获取环境信息以及公众参与环境决策中受益,因此提出了一个框架来帮助马来西亚实现这一目标。这项研究开辟了新的领域,因为它报道了在马来西亚进行过稀疏探索的研究领域中的近期事件和发展(或缺乏)。由于该国仍面临环境恶化和公众对提高政府透明度,问责制和公民参与度的日益增长的需求,因此这也是及时的。希望本文中的研究工作能够丰富有关环境治理主题领域的现有知识,特别是环境获取权,并有助于在马来西亚,东盟地区以及全世界促进良好的环境治理和民主。

著录项

  • 作者

    Syafrina Nur;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号