首页> 外文OA文献 >Multicountry survey of emergency and critical care medicine physicians’ fluid resuscitation practices for adult patients with early septic shock
【2h】

Multicountry survey of emergency and critical care medicine physicians’ fluid resuscitation practices for adult patients with early septic shock

机译:针对早期感染性休克的成年患者的急诊和重症监护医学医师液体复苏实践的多国调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Evidence to guide fluid resuscitation evidence in sepsis continues to evolve. We conducted a multicountry survey of emergency and critical care physicians to describe current stated practice and practice variation related to the quantity, rapidity and type of resuscitation fluid administered in early septic shock to inform the design of future septic shock fluid resuscitation trials.Using a web-based survey tool, we invited critical care and emergency physicians in Canada, the UK, Scandinavia and Saudi Arabia to complete a self-administered electronic survey.A total of 1097 physicians responses were included. 1 L was the most frequent quantity of resuscitation fluid physicians indicated they would administer at a time (46.9%, n=499). Most (63.0%, n=671) stated that they would administer the fluid challenges as quickly as possible. Overall, normal saline and Ringers solutions were the preferred crystalloid fluids used often or always in 53.1% (n=556) and 60.5% (n=632) of instances, respectively. However, emergency physicians indicated that they would use normal saline often or always in 83.9% (n=376) of instances, while critical care physicians said that they would use saline often or always in 27.9% (n=150) of instances. Only 1.0% (n=10) of respondents indicated that they would use hydroxyethyl starch often or always; use of 5% (5.6% (n=59)) or 20-25% albumin (1.3% (n=14)) was also infrequent. The majority (88.4%, n=896) of respondents indicated that a large randomised controlled trial comparing 5% albumin to a crystalloid fluid in early septic shock was important to conduct.Critical care and emergency physicians stated that they rapidly infuse volumes of 500-1000 mL of resuscitation fluid in early septic shock. Colloid use, specifically the use of albumin, was infrequently reported. Our survey identifies the need to conduct a trial on the efficacy of albumin and crystalloids on 90-day mortality in patients with early septic shock.
机译:脓毒症中指导液体复苏证据的证据在不断发展。我们对急诊和重症监护医生进行了多国调查,以描述当前陈述的实践以及与早期败血性休克中施用的复苏液的数量,速度和类型有关的实践差异,以指导未来败血性休克液体复苏试验的设计。基于调查的工具,我们邀请了加拿大,英国,斯堪的纳维亚半岛和沙特阿拉伯的重症监护和急诊医师完成自我管理的电子调查,其中包括1097名医生的回复。 1 L是最频繁使用的复苏液,医师表示他们一次可以服用(46.9%,n = 499)。大多数(63.0%,n = 671)表示他们将尽快应对流动性挑战。总体而言,分别在53.1%(n = 556)和60.5%(n = 632)的情况下,经常或始终使用生理盐水和林格斯液是优选的晶体液。但是,急诊医师表示他们会经常或总是在83.9%(n = 376)的情况下使用生理盐水,而重症监护医师说他们会经常或总是在27.9%(n = 150)的情况下使用生理盐水。只有1.0%(n = 10)的受访者表示他们会经常或始终使用羟乙基淀粉。也很少使用5%(5.6%(n = 59))或20-25%的白蛋白(1.3%(n = 14))。大多数(88.4%,n = 896)的受访者表示,进行早期败血性休克比较大型白蛋白和晶体液的5%的随机对照试验很重要。重症监护和急诊医师表示,他们迅速注入了500-早期败血症性休克时应使用1000 mL的复苏液。很少报道使用胶体,特别是使用白蛋白。我们的调查确定有必要对败血性休克早期患者白蛋白和晶体对90天死亡率的功效进行试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号