首页> 外文OA文献 >Antitrust and the Financial Sector - with Special Attention to 'Too Big to Fail'
【2h】

Antitrust and the Financial Sector - with Special Attention to 'Too Big to Fail'

机译:反垄断与金融业 - 特别注意“太大而不能倒”

摘要

Antitrust and the financial sector have traditionally had a wary relationship with each other. However, an analysis of the special features of finance and of financial regulation shows that the pro-competition stance of antitrust is as appropriate for the financial sector as it is for the other sectors of the U.S. economy to which antitrust enforcement regularly applies.More recently, the involvement of “too big to fail” (TBTF) financial institutions in the financial crisis of 2008-2009 has caused some antitrust practitioners to believe that the “big” in TBTF must mean that antitrust somehow has a role to play in dealing with the TBTF problem. But TBTF is fundamentally a problem of subsidy and negative externalities, not of market power; consequently, this is not an antitrust issue.Nevertheless, antitrust is relevant for many of the standard issues of the creation, enhancement, and/or exercise of market power in and around the financial sector. In addition, whether the communication among and/or collective action by securities holders in various circumstances (e.g., the creditors of a troubled enterprise) warrants antitrust scrutiny deserves some careful thought and analysis.
机译:传统上,反托拉斯与金融部门之间一直保持警惕的关系。但是,对金融和金融监管的特殊特征的分析表明,反托拉斯的竞争立场与金融行业以及反托拉斯执法经常适用的美国其他部门一样适用。 ,“太大而不能倒”(TBTF)金融机构参与了2008-2009年的金融危机,这使一些反托拉斯从业者认为TBTF的“大”必定意味着反托拉斯在某种程度上可以应对TBTF问题。但是,TBTF从根本上讲是补贴和负外部性的问题,而不是市场支配力。因此,这不是一个反托拉斯问题。但是,反托拉斯与在金融部门内部和周围建立,增强和/或行使市场支配力的许多标准问题有关。另外,在各种情况下证券持有人之间的沟通和/或由证券持有人(或陷入困境的企业的债权人)采取的集体行动是否值得进行反托拉斯审查,值得进行认真的思考和分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    White Lawrence J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号