首页> 外文OA文献 >The influence of procurement methods on dispute resolution mechanism choice in construction.
【2h】

The influence of procurement methods on dispute resolution mechanism choice in construction.

机译:采购方式对建设中争议解决机制选择的影响。

摘要

The success of major infrastructure projects is crucial to economic development. Clients' expectations that infrastructure projects will meet their objectives are however confronted by hackneyed construction and engineering challenges relating to cost overruns, delays, issues of quality and disputes. In dealing with major construction disputes, the focus has been on the promotion of the use of alternative resolution mechanisms. The discussions in the literature on the subject have, however, failed to align the procurement method with the parties' selection of dispute resolution mechanism in the event of disputes. The result of the failure has been cost in terms of resources and relationships. An understanding of the link between procurement methods and DRM will avoid situations where cooperating construction entities end up as adversaries mainly as a result of how disputes between them are resolved. The study reports on the preliminary phase of on-going research into the avoidence/resolution of major infrastructure project disputes. Initial findings, based on a critical review of the literature and an analysis of DRM provisions in standard forms of contract, show that: (i) The standard contracts have virtually the same provisions on dispute resolution regardless of the procurement method: arbitration, adjudication/dispute board ; (ii) whilst there is ample evidence of the impact of choice of procurement method on project success generally, the literature on the relationship between procurement methods and dispute reduction and resolution is fragmented and of limited direct relevance. What research exists on the subject is primarily confined to an examination of the relationship between procurement methods and dispute frequencies. There are, however, indications from the literature of strong connection between choice of procurement methods and DRM. The implications of the initial findings for the design of the rest of the on-going study are examined.
机译:大型基础设施项目的成功对经济发展至关重要。然而,客户对基础设施项目将实现其目标的期望面临着与成本超支,延误,质量问题和纠纷有关的棘手的建筑和工程挑战。在处理重大建筑纠纷时,重点一直放在促进使用替代解决机制上。但是,文献中有关该主题的讨论未能使采购方法与发生争议时各方选择的争议解决机制保持一致。失败的结果是在资源和关系方面的成本。了解采购方法与DRM之间的联系将避免出现合作的建筑实体最终成为对手的情况,这主要是因为它们之间的争端得到了解决。该研究报告了有关避免/解决重大基础设施项目纠纷的持续研究的初步阶段。根据对文献的严格审查和对标准合同形式的DRM条款的分析,初步发现表明:(i)无论采用何种采购方式,标准合同在争议解决方面的条款几乎相同:仲裁,裁决/争议委员会; (ii)尽管有充分的证据表明采购方法的选择通常对项目成功有影响,但有关采购方法与减少争议和解决纠纷之间关系的文献零散且直接相关性有限。关于该主题的研究主要限于检查采购方法和争议频率之间的关系。但是,从文献中可以看出,采购方法的选择与DRM之间有着密切的联系。研究了初步发现对其余正在进行的研究的设计的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号