首页> 外文OA文献 >Combined oral contraceptives, thrombophilia and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Combined oral contraceptives, thrombophilia and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:联合口服避孕药,血栓形成和静脉血栓栓塞的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析

摘要

Background Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is shown to be more pronounced in women with hereditary thrombophilia. Currently, WHO recommendations state that COC-use in women with hereditary thrombophilias (antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, factor V Leiden and prothrombin-G20210A mutation) is associated with an unacceptable health risk. Objective To perform a meta-analysis evaluating the additional risk of VTE in COC-users with thrombophilia. Methods The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched on 10 February 2015 for potential eligible studies. A distinction was made between mild' (factor V Leiden and prothrombin-G20210A mutation) and severe' thrombophilia (antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, double heterozygosity or homozygosity of factor V Leiden and prothrombin-G20210A mutation). Results We identified 12 case-control and three cohort studies. In COC-users, mild and severe thrombophilia increased the risk of VTE almost 6-fold (rate ratio [RR], 5.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.21-8.23) and 7-fold (RR, 7.15; 95% CI, 2.93-17.45), respectively. The cohort studies showed that absolute VTE risk was far higher in COC-users with severe thrombophilia than in those with mild thrombophilia (4.3 to 4.6 vs. 0.49 to 2.0 per 100 pill-years, respectively), and these differences in absolute risks were also noted in non-affected women (0.48 to 0.7 vs. 0.19 to 0.0), but with the caveat that absolute risks were estimated in relatives of thrombophilic patients with VTE (i.e. with a positive family history). Conclusion These results support discouraging COC-use in women with severe hereditary thrombophilia. By contrast, additive VTE risk of mild thrombophilia is modest. When no other risk factors are present, (e.g. family history) COCs can be offered to these women when reliable alternative contraceptives are not tolerated.
机译:背景联合口服避孕药(COCs)与静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加有关,这在遗传性血栓形成症的女性中更为明显。目前,世界卫生组织的建议指出,患有遗传性血友病(抗凝血酶缺乏症,蛋白C缺乏症,蛋白S缺乏症,因子V莱顿和凝血酶原-G20210A突变)的妇女使用COC会带来无法接受的健康风险。目的进行荟萃分析,评估患有血友病的COC使用者VTE的额外风险。方法于2015年2月10日对MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库进行搜索,以寻找可能的合格研究。轻度(因子V莱顿和凝血酶原-G20210A突变)和重度'血栓形成(抗凝血酶缺乏症,蛋白C缺乏症,蛋白S缺乏症,因子V莱顿和凝血酶原-G20210A突变的双重杂合性或纯合性)之间有所区别。结果我们确定了12个病例对照研究和3个队列研究。在COC使用者中,轻度和重度血友病患者将VTE的风险增加了近6倍(比率[RR],5.89; 95%置信区间[CI],4.21-8.23)和7倍(RR,7.15; 95%) CI,2.93-17.45)。队列研究显示,严重血友病患者的COV使用者的绝对VTE风险远高于轻度血友病患者(分别为每100药年4.3到4.6对0.49到2.0对)。注意在未患病的女性中(0.48至0.7对0.19至0.0),但需要注意的是,估计血栓性VTE血栓患者的亲属的绝对风险(即家族史阳性)。结论这些结果支持了严重遗传性血栓形成患者不鼓励使用COC。相比之下,轻度血栓形成的附加VTE风险适中。如果没有其他危险因素存在(例如家族病史),则在不能耐受可靠的替代避孕药具的情况下,可以向这些妇女提供COC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号