首页> 外文OA文献 >Changing hospitals, choosing chemotherapy and deciding you’ve made the right choice: Understanding the role of online support groups in different health decision-making activities
【2h】

Changing hospitals, choosing chemotherapy and deciding you’ve made the right choice: Understanding the role of online support groups in different health decision-making activities

机译:更换医院,选择化学疗法并确定您做出了正确的选择:了解在线支持小组在不同健康决策活动中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To investigate the ways in which people use online support groups (OSGs) in relation to their health decision-making and to identify the key features of the resource that support those activities.ududMethod: Eighteen participants who used OSGs for a range of health conditions participated in qualitative study in which they were interviewed about their experiences of using OSGs in relation to decision-making. Exploration of their experiences was supported by discussion ofudillustrative quotes.ududResults: Across the health conditions OSGs supported two main decision-making activities: (i) prompting decision making and (ii) evaluating and confirming decisions already made. Depending on the activity, participants valued information about the process, the experience and the outcome of patient narratives. The importance of forum interactivity was highlighted in relation to advice-seeking and the selection of relevant personal experiences.ududConclusion: People use OSGs in different ways to support their health related decision-making valuing the different content types of the narratives and the interactivity provided by the resource.ududPractice implications: Engaging with OSGs helps people in a number of different ways in relation to decision-making. However, it only forms one part of people’s decision-making strategies and appropriate resources should be signposted where possible.
机译:目的:调查人们在其健康决策中使用在线支持小组(OSG)的方式,并确定支持这些活动的资源的关键特征。 ud ud方法:18名使用OSG进行干预的参与者一系列健康状况参加了定性研究,在访谈中,他们接受了在决策中使用OSG的经验。结果:通过讨论健康的生活习惯,OSG支持两种主要的决策活动:(i)促进决策制定和(ii)评估和确认已经做出的决策。根据活动的不同,参与者重视有关患者叙述的过程,经验和结果的信息。总结了论坛互动在寻求建议和选择相关个人经历方面的重要性。 ud ud结论:人们以不同的方式使用OSG来支持与健康相关的决策,从而评估叙述和内容的不同内容类型。 ud ud的实践意义:参与OSG可以通过多种不同的方式帮助人们进行决策。但是,它只是人们决策策略的一部分,应在可能的地方张贴适当的资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号