首页> 外文OA文献 >Smoking cessation in severe mental ill health: what works? an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Smoking cessation in severe mental ill health: what works? an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:严重精神疾病患者戒烟:什么有效?更新的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background:udPeople with severe mental ill health are more likely to smoke than those in the general population. It is therefore important that effective smoking cessation strategies are used to help people with severe mental ill health to stop smoking. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and cost–effectiveness of smoking cessation and reduction strategies in adults with severe mental ill health in both inpatient and outpatient settings.ududMethods:udThis is an update of a previous systematic review. Electronic databases were searched during September 2016 for randomised controlled trials comparing smoking cessation interventions to each other, usual care, or placebo. Data was extracted on biochemically-verified, self-reported smoking cessation (primary outcome), as well as on smoking reduction, body weight, psychiatric symptom, and adverse events (secondary outcomes).ududResults:udWe included 26 trials of pharmacological and/or behavioural interventions. Eight trials comparing bupropion to placebo were pooled showing that bupropion improved quit rates significantly in the medium and long term but not the short term (short term RR = 6.42 95% CI 0.82–50.07; medium term RR = 2.93 95% CI 1.61–5.34; long term RR = 3.04 95% CI 1.10–8.42). Five trials comparing varenicline to placebo showed that that the addition of varenicline improved quit rates significantly in the medium term (RR = 4.13 95% CI 1.36–12.53). The results from five trials of specialised smoking cessation programmes were pooled and showed no evidence of benefit in the medium (RR = 1.32 95% CI 0.85–2.06) or long term (RR = 1.33 95% CI 0.85–2.08). There was insufficient data to allowing pooling for all time points for varenicline and trials of specialist smoking cessation programmes. Trials suggest few adverse events although safety data were not always reported. Only one pilot study reported cost effectiveness data.ududConclusions:udBupropion and varenicline, which have been shown to be effective in the general population, also work for people with severe mental ill health and their use in patients with stable psychiatric conditions. Despite good evidence for the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for people with severe mental ill health, the percentage of people with severe mental ill health who smoke remains higher than that for the general population.
机译:背景: ud患有严重精神疾病的人比普通人群更容易吸烟。因此,重要的是要使用有效的戒烟策略来帮助患有严重精神疾病的人戒烟。这项研究旨在评估住院和门诊患者在严重精神疾病患者中戒烟和减少吸烟策略的有效性和成本效益。 ud udMethods: ud这是先前系统评价的更新。 2016年9月在电子数据库中搜索了随机对照试验,以比较戒烟干预措施,常规护理或安慰剂的干预措施。提取有关生化检验,自我报告的戒烟(主要结局)以及减少吸烟,体重,精神症状和不良事件(继发性结局)的数据。 ud ud结果: ud我们纳入了26项关于药理和/或行为干预。汇总了8个比较安非他酮和安慰剂的试验,表明安非他酮在中长期内显着提高了戒烟率,但短期内不显着提高(短期RR = 6.42 95%CI 0.82–50.07;中期RR = 2.93 95%CI 1.61-5.34 ;长期RR = 3.04 95%CI 1.10–8.42)。有五项比较伐尼克兰和安慰剂的试验表明,在中期,添加伐尼克兰可显着提高戒烟率(RR = 4.13 95%CI 1.36–12.53)。汇总了五项专门戒烟计划试验的结果,没有显示中度(RR = 1.32 95%CI 0.85–2.06)或长期(RR = 1.33 95%CI 0.85–2.08)有益处的证据。没有足够的数据来允许在所有时间点集中使用伐尼克兰和专家戒烟计划的试验。试验表明不良事件很少,尽管并不总是报道安全数据。只有一项试点研究报告了成本效益数据。 ud ud结论: ud安非他酮和伐尼克兰在一般人群中被证明是有效的,它们也适用于患有严重精神疾病的患者及其在精神状态稳定的患者中的使用。尽管有充分的证据表明戒烟干预措施对患有严重精神疾病的人有效,但是吸烟严重精神疾病的人的比例仍然高于普通人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号