首页> 外文OA文献 >800 years on can Magna Carta still disrupt the executive?
【2h】

800 years on can Magna Carta still disrupt the executive?

机译:800年以来,《大宪章》是否仍会扰乱高管?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In June 1215 King John put his seal to Magna Carta, which over the centuries has become an icon of English (British) liberties. Clause 40 about not selling, denying or delaying justice, and Clause 39, that no free man is to be imprisoned or dispossessed “save by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land” are still in force today. For these reasons Lord Denning described Magna Carta as “the greatest constitutional document of all times—the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot”. In other words the executive can never be above the law, but for this principle to be enforced the state must disclose evidence by due process to the public by which it can be held to account. This essay explores the threats to openness of government in the digital age, which runs the risk of undermining this fundamental principle of the British constitution. These range from the intrusiveness of our surveillance society, ill-considered notions of a post-privacy world, misconceived concepts of open data to the immense difficulty of scrutinizing born-digital data released under due process for sensitive content. Such threats are balanced by a much more assertive judiciary under the supreme court, which like its American counterpart strikes down legislation, an unelected second chamber willing to challenge the executive and House of Commons select committees that are increasingly baring their teeth. This article is published as part of a collection entitled ‘IT as a utility’.
机译:1215年6月,约翰国王将印章放到了《大宪章》,数百年来,它已成为英国(英国)自由的标志。关于不出售,否认或拖延正义的第40条以及“不得因同peer的合法判断或土地法律而被禁止监禁或剥夺自由人”的第39条今天仍然有效。由于这些原因,丹宁勋爵将《大宪章》描述为“有史以来最伟大的宪法文件,是个人自由对抗专制专政的基础。”换句话说,行政人员永远不能超越法律,但要贯彻这一原则,国家必须通过正当程序向公众披露证据,以追究其责任。本文探讨了数字时代政府开放的威胁,这有可能破坏英国宪法的这一基本原则。这些范围包括我们的监视社会的侵入性,对私有后世界的不良考虑,对开放数据的误解,对在适当程序下针对敏感内容发布的出生数字数据进行审查的巨大困难。最高法院下有一个更加果断的司法机构来平衡这种威胁,就像其美国同行罢免立法一样,一个未经选举产生的第二议院愿意挑战执行官和下议院的特选委员会,而这两个委员会正日益露出自己的牙齿。本文作为标题为“ IT即实用程序”的集合的一部分发布。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moss Michael;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号