首页> 外文OA文献 >Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Editor's introduction & Editor's closing thoughts
【2h】

Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Editor's introduction & Editor's closing thoughts

机译:缩小差距:第二语言学习和教学中的认知和社会方法。编者的介绍和编者的闭幕思想

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For some, research in learning and teaching of a second language (L2) runs the risk of disintegrating into irreconcilable approaches to L2 learning and use. On the one side, we find researchers investigating linguistic-cognitive issues, often using quantitative research methods including inferential statistics; on the other side, we find researchers working on the basis of sociocultural or sociocognitive views, often using qualitative research methods including case studies and ethnography. Is there a gap in research in L2 learning and teaching? The present article developed from an invited colloquium at the 2013 meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics in Dallas, Texas. It comprises nine single-authored pieces, with an introduction and a conclusion by the coeditors. Our overarching goals are (a) to raise awareness of the limitations of addressing only the cognitive or only the social in research on L2 learning and teaching and (b) to explore ways of bridging and/or productively appreciating the cognitive-social gap in research. Collectively, the nine contributions advance the possibility that the approaches are not irreconcilable and that, in fact, cognitive researchers and social researchers will benefit by acknowledging insights and methods from one another.
机译:对于某些人来说,第二语言(L2)的学习和教学研究存在分解为不可协调的L2学习和使用方法的风险。一方面,我们发现研究人员通常使用定量研究方法(包括推论统计)来研究语言认知问题。另一方面,我们发现研究人员是根据社会文化或社会认知观点开展工作的,通常使用定性研究方法,包括案例研究和人种志研究。 L2学与教方面的研究是否存在差距?本文是根据在得克萨斯州达拉斯举行的美国应用语言学协会2013年会议上邀请的座谈会编写的。它包括九篇单著,并由合编者作了引言和结论。我们的总体目标是(a)提高对第二语言学习和教学研究中仅解决认知问题或仅解决社会问题的局限性的认识;(b)探索弥合和/或有效地提高研究中认知社会差距的方法。总的来说,这九种贡献提高了这种方法并非不可协调的可能性,实际上,认知研究者和社会研究者将从彼此认可的见解和方法中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号