首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation
【2h】

Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation

机译:将基于纸张的监测和评估系统与移动医疗系统进行比较,以支持国家社区卫生工作者计划,南非:评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to address a complex disease burden, including improving progress towards MDGs 4 and 5, South Africa recently introduced a re-engineered Primary Health Care (PHC) strategy, which has led to thedevelopment of a national community health worker (CHW) programme. The present study explored the development of a cell phone-based and paper-based monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system to support the work of the CHWs.METHODS: One sub-district in the North West province was identified for the evaluation. One outreach team comprising ten CHWs maintained both the paper forms and mHealth system to record household data on community-basedservices. A comparative analysis was done to calculate the correspondence between the paper and phone records. A focus group discussion was conducted with the CHWs. Clinical referrals, data accuracy and supervised visits werecompared and analysed for the paper and phone systems.RESULTS: Compared to the mHealth system where data accuracy was assured, 40% of the CHWs showed a consistently high level (>90% correspondence) of data transfer accuracy on paper. Overall, there was an improvement over time,and by the fifth month, all CHWs achieved a correspondence of 90% or above between phone and paper data. The most common error that occurred was summing the total number of visits and/or activities across the five householdactivity indicators. Few supervised home visits were recorded in either system and there was no evidence of the team leader following up on the automatic notifications received on their cell phones. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation emphasizes the need for regular supervision for both systems and rigorous and ongoing assessments of data quality for the paper system. Formalization of a mHealth M&E system for PHC outreach teams delivering community based services could offer greater accuracy of M&E and enhance supervision systems for CHWs.
机译:背景:为解决复杂的疾病负担,包括改善实现千年发展目标4和5的进展,南非最近引入了重新设计的初级卫生保健(PHC)战略,该战略导致了国家社区卫生工作者(CHW)的发展。 )程序。本研究探索了基于手机和纸质的监控和评估(M&E)系统的开发,以支持社区卫生工作者的工作。方法:在西北省份中确定了一个分区进行评估。一个由十个社区卫生工作者组成的外展团队维护了纸质表格和mHealth系统,以记录基于社区服务的家庭数据。进行了比较分析以计算纸张和电话记录之间的对应关系。与CHW进行了焦点小组讨论。结果:与保证数据准确性的mHealth系统相比,有40%的CHW表现出始终如一的高水平(> 90%对应)数据传输,与纸质和电话系统的临床转诊,数据准确性和有监督的就诊进行了比较和分析。在纸上的准确性。总体而言,随着时间的推移,情况有所改善,到第五个月,所有CHW的电话和书面数据之间的对应关系均达到90%或更高。发生的最常见错误是对五个家庭活动指标的访问和/或活动总数进行求和。在这两个系统中,很少有受监督的家访记录,并且没有证据表明团队负责人会跟踪他们手机上收到的自动通知。结论:评估强调需要对系统进行定期监督,并对纸质系统的数据质量进行严格且持续的评估。为PHC外展团队提供基于社区的服务的mHealth M&E系统的正式化可以提高M&E的准确性,并增强对CHW的监督系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号