首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative Perspective of Pulmonary Rehabilitation among Nurses, Physical Therapists,Occupational Therapists, and Speech-Language-Hearing Therapists.
【2h】

Comparative Perspective of Pulmonary Rehabilitation among Nurses, Physical Therapists,Occupational Therapists, and Speech-Language-Hearing Therapists.

机译:护士,物理治疗师,职业治疗师和语言听力治疗师的肺康复的比较视角。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: This study aims to describe differences in knowledge, practice and recognition of pulmonary rehabilitation between twogroups of health care professionals; the nurse group and the therapist group.METHOD: A self-oriented questionnaire was delivered to two groups of the subjects: one group (nurse group) included 22 nurses andanother group (therapist group) included 5 physical therapists, 3 occupational therapists, and 2 speech-language-hearing therapists in ahospital. Pearson’ χ2 method was used to compare knowledge, practice and recognition of pulmonary rehabilitation between the twogroups.RESULTS and DISCUSSION: The therapist group had higher knowledge on all items of pulmonary rehabilitation, whereas the nursegroup had higher knowledge on only three items; “guidance of abdominal breathing,” “bronchial drainage,” “breath assistance methods.”The same results were observed on practice of pulmonary rehabilitation. About 80% of all subjects responded that a team approach wasan important method to deliver pulmonary rehabilitation to patients; however, about 70% of them reported that cooperation of nurses andtherapists was not achieved in their hospitals. In order to deliver comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation to patients, effectivecooperation by all health care professionals, including nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language-hearingtherapists, should be encouraged.
机译:目的:本研究旨在描述两组医护人员在肺康复知识,实践和认识上的差异;护士组和治疗师组。方法:向两组受试者发送一份自我导向的问卷:一组(护士组)包括22名护士,另一组(治疗师组)包括5位物理治疗师,3位职业治疗师和2位言语听觉治疗师。一所医院。皮尔森的χ2方法用于比较两组之间肺康复的知识,实践和认识。结果与讨论:治疗师组对所有肺康复项目都有较高的知识,而护士组仅对三个项目有较高的知识。 “腹部呼吸指导”,“支气管引流”,“呼吸辅助方法”。在实践肺康复中也观察到了相同的结果。大约80%的受试者回答说,团队合作是向患者提供肺部康复的重要方法。但是,他们中大约70%的人报告说他们的医院没有实现护士和治疗师的合作。为了向患者提供全面的肺部康复,应鼓励包括护士,理疗师,职业治疗师和言语治疗师在内的所有医疗保健专业人员进行有效合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号