首页> 外文OA文献 >Comprehending the Legality of the Use of the Term “Practicable” in the South African Constitution from the African Languages Perspective
【2h】

Comprehending the Legality of the Use of the Term “Practicable” in the South African Constitution from the African Languages Perspective

机译:从非洲语言角度理解南非宪法中“可行”一词的合法性

摘要

The Constitution of South Africa is the fundamental guideline determining the way the country should be managed and governed. At the time of its drafting, the main aim of the Constitution was to heal the divisions of the past and establish a society based on social justice, democratic values and basic human rights. However, the use of certain South African languages has been subjected to limitations, making the full implementation of some of the provisions of the Constitution impossible. The Constitutional provisions, especially as they relate to the indigenous South African languages, have given rise to the debate concerning the use of the term “practicable”. Taking sections 29 and 35 of the Constitution as the point of departure, in this article I explore the use of this qualifier, the employment of which sometimes leads to misunderstandings and uncertainties with regard to language rights.
机译:南非宪法是确定该国管理和治理方式的基本指南。在起草宪法时,《宪法》的主要目的是消除过去的分歧,建立一个以社会正义,民主价值观和基本人权为基础的社会。但是,某些南非语言的使用受到限制,因此无法充分执行《宪法》的某些规定。宪法规定,特别是涉及南非土著语言的规定,引起了关于使用“可行”一词的辩论。本文以《宪法》第29条和第35条为出发点,在本文中,我探讨了该限定词的用法,使用该限定词有时会导致语言权利方面的误解和不确定性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Madonsela Stanley;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号