首页> 外文OA文献 >The effect of mode of test administration on computerised assessment results using proctored and unproctored test administration procedures
【2h】

The effect of mode of test administration on computerised assessment results using proctored and unproctored test administration procedures

机译:使用监督和未经处理的测试管理程序,测试管理模式对计算机化评估结果的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect that mode of testadministration could have on computerised assessment results involving proctored andunproctored test conditions. Two South African test instruments, the Learning PotentialComputerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT) and the Career Preference ComputerisedAdaptive Test (CPCAT) were used in the study. A quantitative, quasi-experimentaldesign was used, and a convenience sample for LPCAT (N=82) and CPCAT (N=81)consisted of employees in the hospitality industry. Using a within-participants design,the dependent t-test was used for statistical analysis.For the total group the LPCAT results yielded no statistically significant differencesbetween the mean scores for the two different modes of administration. For the totalgroup the CPCAT results yielded statistically significant differences in the mean scoresper mode of administration for five out of 34 dimensions, however, for the majority of theCPCAT sub-dimensions, the mode of administration did not impact on results.It was concluded that mode of administration did not impact on the cognitive test scoresand only to a very limited degree on the non-cognitive test scores. Based on the resultsthe null hypotheses for the effect of mode of administration were not rejected.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查测试管理模式可能对涉及有条件的和无条件的测试条件的计算机评估结果的影响。这项研究使用了两种南非测试工具,即学习潜力计算机自适应测试(LPCAT)和职业偏好计算机自适应测试(CPCAT)。使用定量的准实验设计,LPCAT(N = 82)和CPCAT(N = 81)的便利性样本由酒店业的员工组成。使用参与者内部设计,将相关的t检验用于统计分析。对于整个组,LPCAT结果在两种不同给药方式的平均得分之间没有统计学上的显着差异。对于整个组,CPCAT结果在34个维度中的5个维度中,每种管理方式的平均得分均具有统计学上的显着差异,但是,对于大多数CPCAT子维度而言,管理方式对结果没有影响。给药量对认知测试分数没有影响,对非认知测试分数的影响非常有限。根据结果​​,不拒绝有关管理方式影响的零假设。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nel Francina Helena;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号