首页> 外文OA文献 >The influence of practical work assessment method in developing practical work skills of advanced level physics students in Zimbabwe
【2h】

The influence of practical work assessment method in developing practical work skills of advanced level physics students in Zimbabwe

机译:实际工作评估方法对津巴布韦高等水平物理专业学生实践工作技能培养的影响

摘要

Practical work plays an important role in the teaching and learning of science. This study was conducted to determine whether the methods and practices employed by physics teachers in Zimbabwe as required by the Zimbabwe School Examination Council (Zimsec) ‘A’ Level Physics Syllabus (9188) on the assessment of practical work skills assist the students in developing other crucial practical skills like manipulation, observational, planning and designing apart from presentation and analysis skills. The convergent parallel mixed methods approach of Creswell (2014) was used to collect, present and analyse data. Quantitative data were collected using the structured observation schedule to get assessment marks for a student using both methods of indirect assessment of practical work skills (IAPS) and direct assessment of practical work skills DAPS for the same practical work activity. Qualitative data were obtained from interviews with the physics teachers and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with the ‘A’ level physics students.Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) of the percentage rating of marks obtained by the student as observed during practical work sessions compared to the obtained mark from the submitted practical work report for the same practical work activity was calculated and found to be 0.135 with a Pvalue of 0.432. Both the narrative approach (Creswell, 2007) and conservation analyses (Gray, 2011) were used to present and analyse data from focus group discussions with ‘A’ level physics students and interviews with the physics teachers.The major finding from the analysis of quantitative data was that there was no association between the grades obtained by the student from DAPS as compared to IAPS for the same practical work activity as the value of r was found to be very low. This implied that passing practical work through the assessment of practical work report did not necessarily mean that the student could have mastered the basic skills of manipulation, designing, observation and planning. The views of physics teachers and students who participated in the study were that, the current method of practical work assessment used by Zimsec is not relevant in encouraging students to develop a variety of practical work skills as students concentrated on mastering presentation and analysis skills in order to pass practical work examinations. The study recommends that an alternative model of practical work assessment that integrates both DAPS and IAPS should be used to ensure valid and reliable assessment of practical work skills of ‘A’ level physics students.
机译:实践工作在科学的教学中起着重要的作用。这项研究的目的是确定津巴布韦学校考试委员会(Zimsec)A级物理课程提纲(9188)所要求的津巴布韦物理教师采用的方法和实践是否有助于学生发展其他技能关键的实践技能,例如操作,观察,计划和设计,以及演示和分析技能。 Creswell(2014)的收敛并行混合方法方法用于收集,呈现和分析数据。使用结构化的观察时间表收集定量数据,以使用间接评估实用工作技能(IAPS)和直接评估实用工作技能DAPS两种方法获得学生的评估分数。定性数据来自对物理老师的访谈和对A级物理学生的焦点小组讨论(FGD)。与实际工作相比,学生获得的分数百分比评级的皮尔逊相关系数(r)与计算从提交的实际工作报告中就同一实际工作活动获得的分数,发现该分数为0.135,P值为0.432。叙事方法(Creswell,2007)和保护性分析(Gray,2011)均用于呈现和分析与A级物理学生进行的焦点小组讨论以及与物理老师的访谈中的数据。定量分析的主要发现数据表明,在相同的实际工作活动中,与IAPS相比,学生从DAPS获得的成绩之间没有关联,因为发现r的值非常低。这意味着通过评估实际工作报告而通过实际工作并不一定意味着学生可以掌握操作,设计,观察和计划的基本技能。参加该研究的物理教师和学生的观点是,Zimsec使用的当前实践工作评估方法与鼓励学生发展各种实践工作技能无关,因为学生专注于掌握演讲和分析技能,以便通过实际工作考试。该研究建议,应使用结合了DAPS和IAPS的另一种实际工作评估模型,以确保对A级物理学生的实际工作技能进行有效和可靠的评估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zezekwa Nicholas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号