首页> 外文OA文献 >Determining matrimonial property rights on divorce : an appraisal of the legal regimes in Botswana
【2h】

Determining matrimonial property rights on divorce : an appraisal of the legal regimes in Botswana

机译:确定离婚的婚姻财产权:对博茨瓦纳法律制度的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The bulk of the matrimonial property regimes operating in Botswanawere inherited from the country's colonial past. Since independencethere ha'> not been any realistic attempt to reform them. The thesis setout to appraisal the legal regimes governing the determination ofmatrimonial property on divorce to ascertain their efficacy in realisingthe legitimate aspiration of married couples. Comparisons were madewith similar countries to determine how these have tackled problemsrelating to determination of matrimonial property on divorce.The study found that where there is a dispute about matrimonialproperty in marriages out of community, the courts have no discretionto readjust the rights of the parties. This situation adversely affect nonworkingwives who spent most of their time looking after theirhusbands and children without being able to acquire capital assets.Recognition is not given to such domestic contribution to the welfareof the family. It was also found that the exercise of the marital powerby husbands of marriages in community of property deprives wives ofthose marriages the right to administer the joint estate. The patriarchalnature of customary law, which governs the majority of disputes aboutmatrimonial property, discriminates against women.Consequently, the following, inter alia, are suggested as reformmeasures.(a) The courts should be g1ven a wide discretionary power,circumscribed by statutory guidelines, to reallocate matrimonialproperty on divorce irrespective of the matrimonial property regime thatgoverns the marriage. TI1e underlying principle should be equality ofsharing but this may be departed from where the circumstances of theparticular case warrant it(b) A spouse's domestic contribution towards the welfare of the familyshould be recognised.(c) The marital power of husbands should be abolished.(d) The provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act should be madeapplicable to customary marriages.
机译:在博茨瓦纳韦尔运作的大部分婚姻财产制度都继承自该国的殖民历史。自独立以来,没有进行过任何实际的改革尝试。本文着手评估关于离婚时确定婚姻财产的法律制度,以确定其在实现已婚夫妇合法愿望方面的效力。与类似国家进行比较,以确定它们如何解决与离婚时确定婚姻财产有关的问题。研究发现,在社区外婚姻中关于婚姻财产存在争议的情况下,法院无权重新调整当事方的权利。这种情况对非劳动妇女造成不利影响,他们把大部分时间都花在照顾丈夫和孩子上而无法获得资本资产。这种家庭内部对家庭福利的贡献并未得到承认。还发现,婚姻丈夫在财产共同体中行使婚姻权力剥夺了这些婚姻的妻子管理联合财产的权利。习惯法的父权制管辖着大多数与婚姻财产有关的争端,歧视妇女。因此,除其他外,建议采取以下措施作为改革措施。(a)法院应具有广泛的酌处权,由成文法则规定,无论离婚的婚姻财产制度如何,在离婚时重新分配婚姻财产。 TI1e的基本原则应是平等分享,但在特定情况下应予以平等对待(b)应承认配偶对家庭福祉的家庭贡献。(c)丈夫的婚姻权应予废除。 d)《婚姻诉讼法》的规定应适用于习惯婚姻。

著录项

  • 作者

    Quansah E. K.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号