首页> 外文OA文献 >The investigation into the development of glass as an expressive medium in China through direct contact with Western methods of making, decoration and forming
【2h】

The investigation into the development of glass as an expressive medium in China through direct contact with Western methods of making, decoration and forming

机译:通过直接接触西方的制作,装饰和成型方法,对中国玻璃作为表现媒介的发展进行了调查

摘要

This thesis is an investigation into the development of glass as an expressive medium in China through direct contact with Western methods of making, decoration and forming glass. The investigation proceeds through an analysis of the parallels between glass objects produced from Kangxi (1662-1722) to Qianlong period (1736-96), and contemporary practitioners’ (2000-2009), which is complemented by my own practice. The investigation mainly looks at three aspects and their inter-relationship within these strands. They are: 1) the history of glassmaking from 1696 to 1795 in the Qing dynasty with Western influences; 2) the analysis of Contemporary Chinese studio/academic glass within the imported UK model; 3) the development of my personal glass practice within this matrix. Practical work is of two components: reproductions of historical examples and personal creative pieces. The inter-relationship/comparison between these three strands seeks to identify themes, such as the influence of the imported models, reactions to them (the nature of hybrid), and the development of Chinese identity within glassmaking. The purpose is to draw similarities and differences from the comparisons in terms of philosophy, attitude, cultural reference and technique, between Qing and contemporary China, to provide general principles in practice and guidance for future development. Basic information has been gathered from a wide range of sources both in China and in the UK using libraries, museums and galleries / literature from books, journals, archives and websites. Some information has been derived from direct contact (emails, interviews, conversations and questionnaires) with practitioners and scholars. The nature of the research has involved the examination of real historical objects and their technical repetitions, visits to Chinese Universities and personal exhibitions. These investigations included the identification of almost all of the extant examples of the Qing dynasty and their examination in terms of the identified aims of the research, especially in terms of physical evidence within the objects themselves. A body of personal work has also been developed and presented as a case study and used as an investigative tool for analysing the contemporary movement and the making of suggestions. The techniques addressed in this research were developed as examples to illustrate the diverse possibilities of practice. The whole study has been complemented by practice, the outcome of the research naturally consisted of a written thesis and a body of personal work. The written part contains the interpretation of contemporary Chinese studio glass and the analysis of its actual influences from Western practice. Furthermore the comparison of historical experiences is given through the viewpoint of a glass practitioner. A series of similarities and differences and the experiences from other practical models (Western Studio Glass Movement) have been illustrated from the comparison, as well as a set of recommendations and a vision for future development in China. The use of visuals, including image comparisons, technical and process illustrations, drawings, videos and actual samples, are designed to give new insights on the research of Chinese glass and provides an added dimension for presenting and encouraging discourse within the research of Art & Design. Additionally, a comprehensive appendix at the end of the thesis records almost all of the existing Qing glass objects while concentrating on the highest quality of the same category both in and out of China. Further information on relative exhibitions, publications and contact lists are useful for those who are willing to pursue a further study.
机译:本文是通过直接接触西方的玻璃制造,装饰和成型方法,来研究玻璃在中国的表现形式。通过对康熙(1662-1722)至乾隆(1736-96)所生产的玻璃制品与当代从业者(2000-2009)之间的相似性进行分析,以我自己的实践为补充。调查主要着眼于三个方面以及它们之间的相互关系。它们是:1)1696年至1795年清朝时期受西方影响的玻璃制造历史; 2)在导入的英国模式下对当代中国工作室/学术玻璃的分析; 3)在此矩阵中我个人玻璃业务的发展。实际工作包括两个部分:历史实例和个人创意作品的复制品。这三部分之间的相互关系/比较旨在确定主题,例如进口模型的影响,对它们的反应(混合的性质)以及玻璃制造中中国身份的发展。目的是从清代与当代中国之间在哲学,态度,文化参照和技术方面的比较中得出异同,为实践提供一般原则并为未来发展提供指导。在中国和英国,已经通过图书馆,博物馆和画廊/文献从书籍,期刊,档案馆和网站上收集了基本信息。一些信息来自与从业人员和学者的直接联系(电子邮件,访谈,对话和问卷)。研究的性质涉及对真实历史物品及其技术重复的考察,对中国大学的访问和个人展览。这些调查包括识别几乎所有现存的清代实例,并根据确定的研究目的对其进行检查,尤其是根据物体内的物理证据进行检查。还开发了个人作品集,并将其作为案例研究,并用作分析当代运动和提出建议的调查工具。本研究中涉及的技术被开发为示例,以说明实践的各种可能性。整个研究得到实践的补充,研究的结果自然包括书面论文和个人作品。书面部分包括对当代中国工作室玻璃的阐释及其对西方实践的实际影响的分析。此外,通过玻璃从业者的观点对历史经验进行了比较。通过比较,我们展示了一系列的异同以及其他实用模型(西方玻璃工作室运动)的经验,以及一系列建议和对中国未来发展的愿景。视觉效果的使用,包括图像比较,技术和工艺插图,图纸,视频和实际样品,旨在为中国玻璃研究提供新见解,并为艺术和设计研究中的陈述和鼓励话语提供更大的维度。此外,论文末尾的综合附录记录了几乎所有现存的清玻璃器皿,同时着重介绍了中国境内和境外同类产品的最高质量。有关相关展览,出版物和联系方式的更多信息对于愿意进行进一步研究的人员很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号