首页> 外文OA文献 >The law of vertical territorial and price restraints in the EU and in the USA : a critical analysis of vertical territorial and price restraints : an argument against legalisation
【2h】

The law of vertical territorial and price restraints in the EU and in the USA : a critical analysis of vertical territorial and price restraints : an argument against legalisation

机译:欧盟和美国的垂直领土和价格限制法:对垂直领土和价格限制的批判性分析:反对合法化的论点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This PhD thesis critically surveys vertical territorial and price restraints in the EU and the USA not just from a legal angle, but also from comparative, economic, theoretical and historical perspectives. Different aspects of such comprehensive research assist with tackling the different issues that have occurred in the law of vertical territorial and price restraints while determining its correct approach. This thesis argues against some existing competition policies and principles, such as the objective of the law of vertical territorial and price restraints. It shows that law of vertical territorial and price restraints should protect effective and free competition. Nevertheless, it follows that the object of effective competition is efficiency which is difficult to determine in situations when RPM or VTR is used. Furthermore, the complexity of vertical competition and vertical chains, including relationships, power and market structures, is surveyed. This thesis advocates the existence of vertical competition and further explains that it is bargaining power which should be assessed in RPM and VTR cases and not horizontal market power, which serves the purpose of horizontal rather than vertical competition. The development of the laws of vertical territorial and price restraints including the analysis of relevant and significant cases both in the EU and the USA within a broader historical framework and relevant theories unveil some inconsistencies and uncertainties. This thesis criticises the formalistic approach within traditional anti-competitive theories and the demagogical approach within the majority of pro-competitive theories offering new suggestions and points of view. Although vertical restraints have been part of US antitrust law and EU competition law almost since the beginning of their existence, this thesis reveals that their approaches have been unsettled and continue to develop with contradictory arguments on this issue across the legal, economical, empirical and theoretical scholarly works, which show lack of understanding of vertical competition. Unfortunately, vertical competition has not been acknowledged as the basic framework for vertical restraints in both the EU and US policies and their legislations. Therefore, this thesis concludes with legislative suggestions which better reflect the nature of vertical restraints.
机译:该博士论文不仅从法律角度,而且从比较,经济,理论和历史的角度对欧盟和美国的纵向领土和价格限制进行了严格的调查。这种全面研究的不同方面有助于解决垂直领域法和价格限制法中出现的不同问题,同时确定其正确方法。本文提出了一些现行的竞争政策和原则,例如垂直领土法和价格限制法的目标。它表明,垂直领土和价格限制法应保护有效和自由的竞争。然而,随之而来的是,有效竞争的目标是效率,这在使用RPM或VTR的情况下很难确定。此外,调查了纵向竞争和纵向链的复杂性,包括关系,力量和市场结构。本文主张纵向竞争的存在,并进一步解释说,应在RPM和VTR案例中评估的是讨价还价能力,而不是横向市场力,它是为了横向竞争而不是纵向竞争的目的。纵向领土和价格限制法的发展,包括在更广泛的历史框架内对欧盟和美国的相关和重大案件进行分析,相关理论揭示了一些矛盾和不确定性。本文对传统的反竞争理论中的形式主义方法和大多数反竞争理论中的消磁方法提出了批评,它们提出了新的建议和观点。尽管垂直约束几乎自存在以来就已成为美国反托拉斯法和欧盟竞争法的一部分,但本论文表明,垂直约束在法律,经济,经验和理论上都尚未解决,并且在此问题上存在矛盾的论点。缺乏对纵向竞争的了解的学术作品。不幸的是,在欧盟和美国的政策及其立法中,垂直竞争并未被视为垂直限制的基本框架。因此,本文以立法建议作为结尾,以更好地反映垂直约束的性质。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jedličková Barbora;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号