首页> 外文OA文献 >Midwives’ emotion and body work in two hospital settings : personal strategies and professional projects
【2h】

Midwives’ emotion and body work in two hospital settings : personal strategies and professional projects

机译:助产士在两个医院环境中的情绪和身体工作:个人策略和专业项目

摘要

Much has been written in recent years of a ‘crisis’ in the recruitment and retention of midwives in the NHS. The crisis has been attributed variously to burnout, a lack of professional autonomy, a bullying culture, and an ideological conflict between the way in which midwives wish to practise and the way they are required to practise within large bureaucratic institutions, such as NHS Trusts. Negotiating these experiences requires a significant amount of emotional labour by midwives, which they may find intolerable. This thesis explores the strategies NHS midwives deploy in order to continue working in NHS maternity services when many of their colleagues are leaving. It examines the extent to which working in a midwife-led service rather than a consultant-led service helps or hinders midwives’ capacity to manage the emotional and ideological demands of their practice. Ethnographic fieldwork was carried out in a consultant unit and an Alongside Midwife-led Unit (AMU) in two NHS Trusts in England. The findings from negotiated interactive observation and in-depth unstructured interviews with eighteen midwives were analysed using inductive ethnographic principles. In order to ameliorate the emotional distress they experienced, the midwives used coping strategies to organise the people and spaces around them. These strategies of organisation and control were part of a personal and professional project which they found almost impossible to articulate because it ran contrary to the ideals of the midwifery discourse. Midwives explained these coping strategies as firstly, necessary in order to deal with institutional constraints and regulations; secondly, out of their control and thirdly, destructive and bad for midwifery. In practice it appeared that the midwives played a role in sustaining these strategies because they formed part of a wider professional project to promote their personal and professional autonomy. These coping strategies were very similar in the Consultant Unit and the Midwifery Unit. A midwife-led service provided the midwives with a space within which to nurture their philosophy of practice. This provided some significant benefits for their emotional wellbeing, but it also polarised them against the neighbouring Delivery Suite. The resulting poor relationships profoundly affected their capacity to provide a service congruent with their professional ideals. This suggests that whilst Alongside Midwife-led Units may attempt to promote a midwifery model of care and a good working environment for midwives, their proximity to consultant-led services compounds the ideological conflict the midwives experience. The strength of their philosophy may have the unintended consequence of silencing open discussion about the negative influence on women of the strategies the midwives use to compensate for ideological conflict and a lack of institutional and professional support.
机译:近年来,NHS招募和保留助产士的“危机”已有很多报道。这场危机的各种原因是职业倦怠,缺乏专业自主权,欺凌文化以及助产士希望实践的方式与要求他们在大型官僚机构(例如NHS Trusts)中实践的方式之间的意识形态冲突。与这些经历进行谈判需要助产士进行大量的情绪劳动,他们可能会无法忍受。本文探讨了NHS助产士部署的策略,以便在许多同事离开时继续在NHS妇产科工作。它研究了由助产士主导的服务而不是由顾问主导的服务在多大程度上有助于或阻碍助产士管理其实践中情感和意识形态要求的能力。人种学实地调查是在英格兰的两个NHS信托基金的一个顾问部门和一个由助产士领导的部门(AMU)中进行的。使用归纳人种志原理,分析了通过协商互动观察和与18名助产士进行的深入非结构化访谈而得出的结果。为了减轻他们所经历的情绪困扰,助产士采用应对策略来组织周围的人和空间。这些组织和控制策略是个人和专业项目的一部分,他们发现几乎无法阐明,因为它与助产士话语的理想背道而驰。助产士首先解释了这些应对策略,这是应对制度约束和法规所必需的。第二,失去控制,第三,破坏性的,不利于助产。在实践中,助产士似乎在维持这些策略中发挥了作用,因为它们是促进个人和职业自治的更广泛的专业项目的一部分。这些应对策略在顾问股和助产士股中非常相似。由助产士领导的服务为助产士提供了一个培养其实践哲学的空间。这为他们的情感健康带来了一些显着的好处,但也使他们与邻近的Delivery Suite产生了两极分化。由此产生的不良关系深刻影响了他们提供与其职业理想相称的服务的能力。这表明,与助产士领导的单位一起尝试促进助产士护理模式和助产士的良好工作环境的同时,它们与顾问主导的服务的接近加剧了助产士所经历的意识形态冲突。他们的哲学的力量可能会产生意料之外的结果,即使关于助产士用来弥补意识形态冲突以及缺乏机构和专业支持的策略对妇女的负面影响的公开讨论沉默。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rayment Juliet;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号