首页> 外文OA文献 >Classical Greek tragedy and the city culture of Athens
【2h】

Classical Greek tragedy and the city culture of Athens

机译:古典希腊悲剧和雅典的城市文化

摘要

As argued, the connection between Athenian BC society and tragedy - an area of research far from exhausted - should be examined on the basis of an anthropological/cultural, and rather comparatively oriented perspective, rather than a purely historical or literary one. A further defence holds that such an approach explores in a fresh way the connection between the two which is based on a model of self, on the one hand, and Sophocles' and Euripides' characters on the other - both proposed to consist of the same culturally framed, yet diversely expressed components which define an individual actor/self as would be portrayed by anthropological studies. Because of the proposed nexus of variously expressed components, the staged character is seen as an agent who exposes the complexity and ambiguity of one's own self of whom the individual agent was unaware of possessing. The above argument, approached mainly through primary sources, will be defended as follows. After defining in the introduction concepts such as `self' and `performance', the discussion on the components of self and character begins by exploring their background - the ideology and culture of Athens. As argued, because of particular factors linked to economic and military power, Athens is contrasted with other Greek cities, and at the same time, its performance culture becomes the topos of the performing self. The second chapter defends the concepts of self and dramatic character, as well as the elements associating them which are cultural projections of the society, but also are associated with the notion of `self as presented in recent anthropological discussions of human agency. Lastly, the third chapter argues on the actualisation of the self's model on stage; after the comparative analysis of the characters' actions in three plays by Sophocles, and three by Euripides, the conclusion reached is that the proposed model of self, cultural, but also self-reliant, is an entity which is utilised as a model agent of staged characters.
机译:如前所述,应该从人类学/文化的角度,而不是相对取向的角度,而不是纯粹的历史或文学角度,来研究雅典不列颠哥伦比亚社会与悲剧之间的联系。进一步的辩护认为,这种方法一方面以一种自我模型为基础,另一方面以Sophocles和Euripides的性格为基础,探索了两者之间的联系,两者都建议由相同的模型组成。具有文化背景,但表达形式多样的成分,这些成分定义了个体行为者/自我,这将在人类学研究中得以体现。由于提议的各种表达组件之间的联系,分阶段的角色被视为一个代理,它暴露了个体代理人不知道拥有的自己的自我的复杂性和歧义。上述论点主要是通过主要来源来解决的,其辩护如下。在介绍性概念中定义了“自我”和“表现”之后,关于自我和性格构成的讨论首先从探索其背景-雅典的意识形态和文化开始。如前所述,由于与经济和军事力量有关的特殊因素,雅典与其他希腊城市形成对比,同时,雅典的表演文化成为表演自我的主题。第二章捍卫了自我和戏剧性的概念,以及与之相关的元素,它们是社会的文化投射,但也与最近人类代理的人类学讨论中提出的“自我”概念相关。最后,第三章论述了自我模型在舞台上的实现。在对Sophocles的三部剧和Euripides的三部剧中角色的行为进行比较分析之后,得出的结论是,所提出的自我,文化以及自力更生的模型是一个实体,被用作模型的主体。上演角色。

著录项

  • 作者

    Butzbach Lazaretta;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号