首页> 外文OA文献 >A study on city centre regeneration : a comparative analysis of two different approaches to the revitalisation of historic city centres in Iran
【2h】

A study on city centre regeneration : a comparative analysis of two different approaches to the revitalisation of historic city centres in Iran

机译:城市中心再生研究:两种不同方法对伊朗历史城市中心振兴的比较分析

摘要

Developing a balanced approach, dealing appropriately with the historic environment. has always been a challenging problem in many countries. There has been a tension between the old and the new and struggle over continuity and change. The historic city centres in Iran have also been the subject of such controversy. The historic cores, which form a very small part of the cities in recent times, have been undermined in the various waves of redevelopment. There has been an underlying emphasis on physical-led regeneration and delivery of flagship projects. This dominant approach, mainly employed by the central government, has failed to solve the problems of the areas; indeed, the interventions carried out within the framework of this approach have exacerbated the existing problems. During the last decade, however, efforts to revitalize Iranian historic cities have gained a new momentum. Several interrelated factors contributed to the changing role or structure of the state in urban regeneration process, which provided a basis for the development of a new approach to the regeneration of historic environment in Iran. Due to the lack of sufficient research on these approaches and the absence of comparing and assessing their results, this study aims to provide a deeper insight and develop a better understanding of these approaches to revitalize the historic urban centre. This is realized by identifying the employed approaches and addressing their deficiencies, exploring factors that shaped the approaches, examining and interpreting the features that characterize the approaches, and assessing their outcomes and impacts. Given the qualitative and exploratory nature of the investigation, this study has employed an in-depth case study methodology. According to the conceptual framework of this research, the emphasis of the study is on mechanisms and interrelationships that affect the process and product of urban regeneration. Accordingly, this study has concentrated on the identification of the agencies involved, the role they play, and their strategies and interests within the economic, political and cultural contexts in which they operated. These roles, strategies and interests are related to the rules, resources and ideas that governed the process. The developed conceptual framework is applied in the study of two cases, each representing a different approach employed by the urban authorities during the last decade. The cases are parts of the historic core of Mashhad and Shiraz the second and sixth largest cities in the country (metropolitan cities). The case of Mashhad exemplifies a physical-led, redevelopment oriented approach employed by the central government and the case of Shiraz represents an integrated, more sensitive, conservation-led approach adopted by the local authorities. The findings of this study provide insights into the issues that policy-makers and practitioners should consider in designing regeneration policies and developing programs and efforts dealing with the problems of historic environments. The primary implications of the study are summarized in five elements including 'a greater balance between local and central'; 'developing innovative local partnerships, multi-agency regeneration partnership'; 'empowering local authorities' (locally-based regeneration); 'adopting and developing an integrated approach' (conservation-led regeneration), and finally involving local people (community-based regeneration).
机译:制定平衡的方法,适当处理历史环境。在许多国家/地区一直是一个具有挑战性的问题。新旧之间一直存在紧张关系,并且在连续性和变化方面也进行了斗争。伊朗历史悠久的市中心也曾是此类争议的主题。在最近的各种重建浪潮中,具有历史意义的核心在最近的城市中只占很小的一部分。从根本上强调了以物理为主导的再生和旗舰项目的交付。这种主要由中央政府采用的主导方法未能解决该地区的问题;实际上,在这种方法框架内进行的干预加剧了现有问题。然而,在过去十年中,振兴伊朗历史名城的努力获得了新的动力。几个相互关联的因素导致了国家在城市更新过程中角色或结构的变化,这为开发新的伊朗历史环境再生方法提供了基础。由于对这些方法缺乏足够的研究,也没有比较和评估其结果,因此本研究旨在提供更深刻的见解,并更好地理解这些方法,以振兴历史悠久的市中心。通过识别所采用的方法并解决其不足之处,探索形成方法的因素,检查和解释方法的特征以及评估其结果和影响来实现这一点。考虑到调查的定性和探索性,本研究采用了深入的案例研究方法。根据这项研究的概念框架,研究的重点是影响城市更新过程和产物的机制和相互关系。因此,本研究着重于确定所涉机构,它们所发挥的作用以及它们在其经营所在的经济,政治和文化背景下的战略和利益。这些角色,策略和兴趣与控制流程的规则,资源和想法有关。发达的概念框架适用于两个案例的研究,每个案例代表了过去十年来城市当局采用的不同方法。这些案件是马什哈德(Mashhad)和设拉子(Shiraz)的历史核心部分,而设拉子是该国第二和第六大城市(大城市)。马什哈德(Mashhad)案体现了中央政府采用的以物资为导向,以重建为导向的方法,而设拉子(Shiraz)案则代表了地方当局采用的综合,更加敏感,以保护为导向的方法。这项研究的结果提供了对决策者和从业者在设计再生政策,制定应对历史环境问题的方案和努力时应考虑的问题的见解。这项研究的主要意义归纳为五个要素,包括“在地方和中央之间取得更大的平衡”。 “发展创新的地方伙伴关系,多机构再生伙伴关系”; “赋予地方当局权力”(基于本地的更新); “采用和发展综合方法”(以保护为主导的再生),最后让当地人参与(基于社区的再生)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Izadi Mohammadsaeid;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号