Принцип трансдисциплінарності, історичний метод та проблема часу з позиції філософського аналізу сучасної екології (The principle of transdisciplinary, historical method and problem udof the time in position philosophical analysis the modern ecology)

摘要

У статті досліджується предмет екології та екологічної футурології, розглядаючи питання принципуududтрандисціплінарності. Аналізуються стратегії збереження довкілля та взаємозв’язок поміжudекологією, економікою та новітніми технологіями. Досліджується питання розуміння культури йudзв’язку екології та екологічних досліджень з питаннями розвитку науки (Given article we continue the analysis of the subject «futurology».We examine variable principles methods’ comingudfrom position of analysis of modern ecology. We one of the exceptional characteristic features of humankind is theudability to critically evaluate the current situation on the one hand, and on the other hand to likewise enthusiasticallyudcreate and live in the world of illusions. So we are trying to exist in this in this world fighting and at the same timeudcreating presumable field for conflicts and ecological, technologic problems. Today, we have new conflict situations andudconflict development of mankind makes us change. It should be mentioned that at certain times there was a key problemudconnected with «compulsory knowledge» for an «educated person» and «the younger generation».udLink of times and processes in scientific word view is lost due to going into details and refinements of biologicaludeducation system. One can see negligence to the authors who were the at the source of natural science, namely to thoseudwho formed our modern biological worldview. Today, if we have a close look at the process of scientific worldviewuddevelopment, the fullness of scientific worldview we will be able to find the starting point of our development problems,udincluding the problems that are related to ecological problems, when the admiration at mechanical defeated commonudwisdom.udProceeded our investigation scientific work, we continue defending several statements. The first one is based uponudthe accentuation of a strict system which accepts as valid ones different definitions of Ecology. These definitions areudmultidirectional proceeding from the time of their origin, and consequently they are defined through the sphere theyudserve. But Ecology in the global sense cannot be restricted to environmental protection technologies. It is not the mainudpurpose of Ecology to fight for «purity of environment». On the whole the interests of Ecology lie in the parameters ofudgrowth, limits of existence. It can be said that Ecology is a science about the system as it is. But adding new meaningsudand contents plays not only appositive role, but also a negative one, creating a field of conflicts which can be based onuddifferent understanding of the subject and object of Ecology which can cause demagogy and over simplicity. We insistudon philosophical comprehension of ecology, developing «The Philosophy of Ecology», «The Ecology Futurology»)