МІСТИЧНИЙ СИМВОЛІЗМ Г. С. СКОВОРОДИ ПІД КУТОМ ЗОРУ ФІЛОСОФСЬКОЇ АНТРОПОЛОГІЇ.ud(Mystical symbolism G.S. Skovoroda the perspective of philosophical anthropology.)

摘要

У статті розглядається проблематика специфіки філософських поглядів Г. С. Сковороди з огляду на їх містичний характер, а також деякі особливості містичного символізму філософа. Це насамперед універсальність, всеохопність розуміння мислеником світу, відмова від традиційних для містицизму індивідуалізму та орієнтації на знання як на головний інструмент контролю над дійсністю.ud(The article deals with issues specific philosophical views G.S. Skovoroda because of their mysterious nature and some characteristics of mystical symbolism philosopher. This is the first universal understanding of the thinkers of the world, the rejection of traditional mysticism individualism andfocus on knowledge as the main instrument of control over reality. Declares that life-affirming nature ofphilosophical mysticism thinker This marks the philosopher interpreted as a methodology of interpretation and exegetical reading code world ofman and nature. Language of the texts in this context is understood as an integral aspect of his whole work. The question of language relates philosopher works so as to avoid ideological speculation. Accented popular character style philosopher, a defining feature ofwhich may be simple.In the context ofmodern philosophical anthropology paper is devoted to the philosophical intentions of the outstanding Ukrainian philosopher The urgency of this time due to new challenges facing European philosophy and Ukrainian as a part of it. His ideas can be used for development and rethinking ideological basis of knowledge and the creation of a new world view that would essentially open character and would meet the needs of an era. Formulated the thesis of the presence gothic spiritualism impact on creative style and philosophical intentions thinker. Also emphasized the important role of existential joy as an important experience in the philosophical world picture thinker. The joy of the experience is interpreted as meaning creation and deployment of human existence. Also fixed orientation philosophizing on the knowledge of the Creator through knowledge creation. That is accented modus interested addressed attitude to the world, his mode of passion, which significantly differs from the philosophical models of Christian Orthodox monasticism. Emphasized the importance of a broader interpretation of the symbols in the scientist.)