ЗНАЧЕННЯ РОМАНУ ЯК “ПРАКТИКИ СЕБЕ” udУ ФОРМУВАННІ МОДЕРНОЇ САМОІДЕНТИЧНОСТІ ОСОБИСТОСТІ (A value of novel as “practices of itself” is in forming of modern self-identity of personality)

摘要

У статті проводиться думка, що роман являє собою особливу світську форму “практик себе”,udщо виникає у добу Нового часу на основі розвитку приватних стосунків; показано, що наративніudпрактики творять нову модель особистісної самоідентичності, соціокультурними вимірами якоїudстають час, почуття і артефакти міжособистісного спілкування (An idea is conducted in the article, that a novel shows the special secular form of “practices of itself”,udthat arises up in New time on the basis of development of private relations. Becoming of novel went out ofudinfluence of any proof literary traditions – opening of historical value of facts of the personal life took placeudon the basis of municipal folklore that acquired the lines of folk form of practice of itself. Stories overgrewudnot simply due to quantitative addition of separate episodes of life; they were consistently opened out inudspace and time, acquired certain structure and became integral history of one life.udThey lost moralist instructive character: Unlike the heroes of folk epos of previous epoches, whichudexecuted will of people, personified his hope, in a novel a man operates independently, from itself.udInnovative maintenance a novel, which was engendered in everyday practice of people, creates the newudmodel of human self-identity, which is formed in active copulas with the world: in the scalene interminglingudwith other people and capture of activity different kinds. Roman is practice of itself not in that sense, thatudsometimes at leisure we read books, but because with us there is something fundamental, when the act ofudreading is intertwined in some totality of our vital displays, vital acts and crystallizes in a clear form thatudhappened with us, that saw that we had read.udA value a novel in forming of modern self-identity consists in that, being “by passing of life”, he becomesudthe instrument of cognition of own desires, which enables to realize itself. In head for self-realization ofudpersonality, it closes up with spiritual practices itself in confession of the real life, which is out of workaday.udIt goes out from here that a point is some; accrete with a lasting act, absolute “I”, different from the pluraludof psychological “I” that makes maintenance of self-identity of personality.udPractice of narration give the modern identity of the new sociocultural measuring – sphere of senses,udinternal feeling of time, artifacts of interpersonally intercourse)