Філософія техніки М. Гайдеггера та сучасні постантропологічні студіїud(Philosophy of Technology of Martin Heidegger and Modern Post-Antropological Studies)

摘要

У статті проаналізовані головні аспекти філософії техніки Мартіна Гайдеггера. У німецького мислителя сутність техніки розкриває себе як Geshtel (висвітлення). Осмислення феномена техніки як висвітлення суті буття стає одним із ключових концептуальних топосів, який уможливлює підійти до осмислення проблеми постлюдини. Звернення до філософії техніки М. Гайдеггера допоможе прояснити деякі тенденції постантропологічного осмислення суб’єкта, виявивши не лише конкретно-наукові, а й філософські витоки проблематикиudпостлюдства.ud(The main point of our research dwells in philosophical problem of technology and its interpretation in the philosophy of the second half of XX century. This cogitative topos considered in context of the late Heidegger’s conception of technology. Even more we are trying to investigate the philosophical problem of technology not only by referencing to late Heidegger thoughts, but we sample to show an intellectual connection between ideas of the German thinker with the modern form of philosophical anthropology which is usually called as: «Post–anthropology». In general we are trying to show, that in the philosophy of Heidegger we can scare up a peculiar source of understanding the problem of posthuman and find a key to the main problems of modern Post–anthropology.udUndoubtedly, the main imminence of our age can be formulated in such statements as: «We shape our tools, thereafter they shape us». This statement becomes the general credo for Post–anthropology during last 20 years.udThe main philosophical questions, which appear within this stream, are connected with identity of a subject, itsudmain features and variations. Post–anthropology is trying to investigate the emergence of a new human being, who isudusually called «Posthuman». The posthuman is indicates a new era in the human civilization, as it combines old humanudfeatures with new technological elaboration. As a result, a person becomes a unique symbiosis of vital specificationsudand technological innovation. However, a human in post–anthropology located between two ontological states: vitaludand natural on one hand, and technological on the other.udAnother important point of our investigation is the ontological comprehension of the technology as it appears inudthe philosophy of Heidegger. Such idea became more and more relevant in the modern post-anthropological discourse.udThe concept of ontological understanding of technology became the «starting point» on the way of consideration ofud«posthuman» in modern philosophical anthropology.)