首页> 外文OA文献 >Mechanisms of harmony and the ordering of word order : consistencies and inconsistencies in language change and acquisition
【2h】

Mechanisms of harmony and the ordering of word order : consistencies and inconsistencies in language change and acquisition

机译:和谐机制和词序排序:语言变化和习得中的一致性和不一致性

摘要

The thesis is based on the learning of word-orders in a cross-lingUistic and historic perspective. In linguistics, a certain hannony is expected in word order. X-bars of a language are supposed to be right-branched or left-branched. So, a language, which is right-branched has its head usually first, and a language, which is left-branched has its head usually last. In the generative framework, linguists argue that when a child encounters a structure where the head is to the right, she will assume that the whole language is constructed this way. Cognitive scientists like Christiansen argue that inconsistencies, that means a mixture of right- and left- branching are more difficult to learn because of recursive embeddings, and thus inconsistencies should simply die out or never come into existence in the first place. Greenberg established language universals after having considered forty languages. These universals would show consistencies in an X-bar branching, but Greenberg also cited exceptions and spoke of statistical universals. We are interested in these inconsistencies. If they are really more difficult to learn, why do they evolve in the first place and why are they often quite consistent in language evolution, i.e. they do not die out. Historical linguistics often argue that languages tend to develop from one consistent language via a transitional one and then develop again towards a consistent language. Inconsistent structures exist in most languages although there is a statistical trend towards consistencies. So, how do languages change and what makes persons learn at one stage a language differently and what are the mechanisms involved in learning that we can see as an end-result in language change. We will examine some of these phenomena, when we discuss�· language change in Romance, the introduction of postpositions in Gennan, and the role of the infinite verb in Gennan and in Old English. Experimental work has been done for the frontability of Gennan particles, which is closely linked to the introduction of postpositions. We did an experiment in English language for the role of the infinite verb in verb-final languages such as Gennan and replicated this experiment in French because of its richer verb morphology because this gives us a greater distinction between finite and infinite verbs. An SRN-simulation on the role of the infinite verb supports the experiments.
机译:本文基于跨语言和历史视角对词序的学习。在语言学中,期望一定的单词顺序。语言的X条应该是右分支或左分支。因此,右分支的语言通常首位,而左分支的语言通常首位。在生成框架中,语言学家认为,当孩子遇到头部朝向右侧的结构时,她将假定整个语言都是以这种方式构造的。像克里斯蒂安森(Christiansen)这样的认知科学家认为,由于存在递归嵌入,不一致,即右分支和左分支的混合更​​难于学习,因此不一致应该简单地消失或根本不存在。格林伯格在考虑了40种语言之后建立了语言通用性。这些通用性将在X-bar分支中显示出一致性,但是Greenberg还引用了例外情况并谈到了统计通用性。我们对这些不一致之处感兴趣。如果它们真的更难学习,为什么它们会首先发展,为什么它们在语言发展中往往非常一致,即它们不会消亡。历史语言学家常常认为,语言倾向于从一种一致的语言发展成为一种过渡的语言,然后又发展为一种一致的语言。尽管存在统计趋向于一致性的趋势,但大多数语言中都存在不一致的结构。因此,语言如何变化以及使人们在一阶段学习不同语言的原因以及我们可以将其视为语言变化的最终结果的学习机制是什么。当我们讨论浪漫中的语言变化,在Gennan中引入后置位以及在Gennan和古英语中无限动词的作用时,我们将研究其中一些现象。 Gennan粒子的可拓性已经进行了实验,这与后置位的引入紧密相关。我们用英语对无限动词在动词-最终语言(如Gennan)中的作用进行了英语实验,由于其动词形态更丰富,因此用法语复制了该实验,因为这使我们在有限动词和无限动词之间有了更大的区别。对无限动词作用的SRN模拟支持实验。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gonitzke Markus;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号