首页> 外文OA文献 >Developing critical thinking skills through integrative teaching of reading and writing in the L2 writing classroom
【2h】

Developing critical thinking skills through integrative teaching of reading and writing in the L2 writing classroom

机译:通过二语写作课堂的阅读和写作综合教学培养批判性思维能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Applying sociocultural principles of mediation, collaboration and scaffolding as the underpinning theory, combined with the integrative teaching of reading and writing method, this study explored how L2 students’ thinking and reasoning abilities as manifested in their argumentative writing skills can be improved. Students’ creative and critical thinking skills and their ability to write logically and intelligently are part of English teaching objectives in the Sudan. However, there are no explicit guidelines on how they could be achieved. In this study therefore, argumentative/persuasive writing is considered to be a manifestation of critical thinking skills, since a writer needs to analyse, evaluate and counter arguments and present a logical text to convince the reader. Thirty, first year university students from the faculty of Medicine, Upper Nile University, Sudan were randomly selected. They were first pre-tested and then randomly assigned into experimental and comparison groups. A twelve-week intervention was conducted in which the experimental group were taught reasoning and critical thinking to enhance their argumentative writing abilities employing integrative teaching of reading and writing method in conjunction with sociocultural principles and Paul and Elder’s (2006, 2007) close reading strategies. After the intervention, the groups were post-tested and a month later after the completion of the study they were post-post-tested. The nature of the tests was argumentative written compositions. In addition, pre and post focus groups interviews were conducted with the experimental group to explore their perceptions and attitudes towards thinking skills before and after the intervention. These interviews were organised to enable the researcher to trace and monitor how students’ ideas and perceptions changed as a result of the intervention. The study found among others that students’ critical thinking, reasoning and argumentative writing skills improved dramatically after the intervention. In addition, there were improvements in their perceptions and attitudes towards thinking skills as well as in their understanding of the cognitive relationship between reading and writing. Moreover, a remarkable improvement in their spoken English was recorded as well as they developed positive attitudes towards learning English. The study concluded that critical thinking skills can be taught at post secondary school level. It recommended that future research should investigate the complexity of argumentative texts written by L2 students and how the complexity of their thinking may lead to the increasing sophistication of the language produced.
机译:本研究以调解,协作和脚手架的社会文化原理为基础理论,并结合阅读和写作方法的综合教学,探讨了如何提高中学生议论文写作能力所表现出的思维和推理能力。学生的创造力和批判性思维能力以及逻辑和智能写作能力是苏丹英语教学目标的一部分。但是,关于如何实现这些目标,没有明确的指南。因此,在本研究中,论据/说服力写作被认为是批判性思维能力的体现,因为作家需要分析,评估和反驳论点,并提出逻辑文本以说服读者。随机选择苏丹上尼罗大学医学院的30名一年级大学生。首先对其进行预测试,然后将其随机分为实验组和比较组。进行了为期十二周的干预,其中实验组通过结合社会文化学原理和Paul and Elder(2006,2007)的紧密阅读策略,结合阅读和写作方法的综合教学,教授推理和批判性思维,以提高他们的议论文写作能力。干预后,对各组进行后测试,并在研究完成一个月后对它们进行后测试。测试的性质是辩论性的书面作品。另外,焦点组前后的访谈均与实验组进行,以探讨他们对干预前后的思维能力的看法和态度。这些访谈的组织是为了使研究人员能够跟踪和监视学生的想法和看法如何因干预而改变。该研究发现,在干预之后,学生的批判性思维,推理和论据写作技巧得到了显着提高。此外,他们对思维能力的看法和态度以及对阅读和写作之间认知关系的理解也有所改善。此外,他们的英语口语得到了显着改善,并且他们对学习英语持积极态度。研究得出的结论是,可以在中学后阶段教授批判性思维技能。它建议未来的研究应该调查第二语言学生撰写的论证性文本的复杂性,以及他们思维的复杂性如何导致所产生的语言日益复杂。

著录项

  • 作者

    Turuk Kuek Mamour Choul;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号