首页> 外文OA文献 >Online alternative dispute resolution as a solution to cross-border electronic commercial disputes
【2h】

Online alternative dispute resolution as a solution to cross-border electronic commercial disputes

机译:在线替代性争议解决方案,作为跨境电子商务纠纷的解决方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Electronic commerce is important,and perhaps,inevitable. Thus to consider the legal implications of the growth and development of electronic commerce is essential.However, the lack of suitable dispute resolution mechanisms in cyberspace will constitute a serious obstacle to the further development of electronic commerce. Bearing this in mind, this thesis argues that when Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) moves to cyberspace particularly arbitration and mediation as the main types of ADR, the form of online alternative dispute resolution (OADR) can maximise the growth of e-commerce. However, in analysing OADR, one must contemplate primarily the value of fair process which OADR solutions are subject to, and the value of efficiency which OADR solutions are seen to achieve. From this perspective, a big challenge for traditional dispute resolution processes such as ADR, will be to adapt to the internet and capitalise on the new possibilities it presents. Another big challenge will be to maintain the integrity and meaning of dispute resolution processes as they move online. But perhaps the greatest challenge will be to design an Online Alternative Dispute Resolutions system which represents an effort at balancing,on the one hand, the need to provide effective mechanisms that increase access to justice, without which there seems little point in introducing the system, and, on the other hand,the need to provide just and fair administration of OADR processes without which the OADR outcome(s) will be cast in doubt. This thesis concludes that OADR is a valid proposition and perhaps the preferred system for resolving disputes that inevitably arise in e-commerce, particularly, B-to-C internet transactions disputes and domain names disputes. This is due to the fact that OADR protects internet users' interests while not harming the interest of the Information Technology (IT) industry and, most importantly, not hindering the flourishing of electronic commerce. That said, a number of legal and technical issues need to be addressed if there is to be a swift and successful deployment of OADR mechanisms in a cross-border environment.Legal issues do not constitute insurmountable obstacles to a successful operation of such schemes, but some uncertainties remain due to technological limitations. Indeed the growth of OADR is tied to the development of technology. The challenge faced by online arbitration lies more in the realm of law than technology, while the challenge faced by online mediation lies more in the realm of technology than law. This is due to the less stringent legal requirements and the crucial role of the communication process in conducting mediation. As a result, as online arbitration is faced with many legal issues, and, as online mediation requires complex and sophisticated communication schemes which are difficult and expensive to set up presently, given time, OADR will be within the ambit of legally and technically possible in the near future.
机译:电子商务很重要,也许是不可避免的。因此,考虑电子商务的增长和发展的法律意义至关重要。但是,网络空间缺乏合适的争议解决机制将严重阻碍电子商务的进一步发展。考虑到这一点,本论文认为,当替代性争议解决(ADR)进入网络空间,特别是仲裁和调解作为ADR的主要类型时,在线替代性争议解决(OADR)的形式可以使电子商务的增长最大化。但是,在分析OADR时,必须首先考虑OADR解决方案所遵循的公平过程的价值以及OADR解决方案所能实现的效率的价值。从这个角度来看,传统争议解决流程(例如ADR)面临的一大挑战将是适应互联网并利用其带来的新可能性。另一个大挑战将是在争端解决流程上线时保持其完整性和意义。但是,也许最大的挑战将是设计一个在线替代性争议解决系统,该系统一方面旨在平衡需要提供有效机制以增加诉诸司法的机会,否则,引入该系统似乎毫无意义,另一方面,有必要对OADR流程进行公正,公正的管理,否则将对OADR的结果产生疑问。本文的结论是,OADR是一个有效的主张,也许是解决电子商务中不可避免出现的纠纷(尤其是B2C互联网交易纠纷和域名纠纷)的首选系统。这是由于OADR保护互联网用户的利益,同时又不损害信息技术(IT)行业的利益,最重要的是,不妨碍电子商务的蓬勃发展。话虽如此,要想在跨境环境中迅速成功地部署OADR机制,就需要解决许多法律和技术问题。法律问题并不是成功实施此类计划的不可逾越的障碍,但是由于技术限制,仍然存在一些不确定性。确实,OADR的增长与技术的发展息息相关。在线仲裁面临的挑战更多地在于法律领域而非技术领域,而在线仲裁面临的挑战更多地在于技术领域而非法律领域。这是由于法律要求不严格,以及沟通过程在进行调解中的关键作用。结果,由于在线仲裁面临许多法律问题,并且由于在线调解需要复杂而复杂的通信方案,目前难以建立且昂贵,因此,在一定的时间范围内,OADR将在法律和技术上均处于可行范围之内。不久的将来。

著录项

  • 作者

    Halous Haitham A;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号