首页> 外文OA文献 >Numerical simulations of unsteady complex geometry flows
【2h】

Numerical simulations of unsteady complex geometry flows

机译:非定常复杂几何流动的数值模拟

摘要

Numerical simulations have been here carried out for turbulent flows in geometries relevant to electronic systems. These include plane and ribbed channels and a central processor unit (CPU). Turbulent flows are random, three-dimensional and time-dependent. Their physics covers a wide range of time and space scales. When separation and reattachment occur, together with streamline curvature, modelling of these complex flows is further complicated. It is well known that, when simulating unsteady flows, the traditional, steady, linear Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models often do not give satisfactory predictions. By contrast, unsteady, non-linear RANS models may perform better. Hence the application of these models is considered here. The non-linear models studied involve explicit algebraic stress and cubic models. The Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) has been also evaluated. Modelling strategies more advanced than RANS, i.e. Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and zonal LES (ZLES), have also been tested. Validation results from URANS, LES and ZLES indicate that the level of agreement of predictions with benchmark data is generally consistent with that gained by the work of others. For the CPU case, flow field and heat transfer predictions from URANS, LES ; and ZLES are compared with measurements. Overall, for the flow field, ZLES and LES are more accurate than URANS. Zonal low Reynolds number URANS models (using a hear wall k-l model) perform better than high Reynolds number models. However, for heat transfer prediction, none of the low Reynolds number models investigated performed well.
机译:这里已经对与电子系统相关的几何形状中的湍流进行了数值模拟。这些包括平面通道和肋通道以及中央处理器单元(CPU)。湍流是随机的,三维的且与时间有关。他们的物理学涵盖了广泛的时间和空间尺度。当发生分离和重新附着以及流线曲率时,这些复杂流的建模会变得更加复杂。众所周知,当模拟非恒定流时,传统的,稳定的线性雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(RANS)模型通常无法给出令人满意的预测。相比之下,非稳态,非线性RANS模型的性能可能更好。因此,这里考虑这些模型的应用。研究的非线性模型涉及显式代数应力和三次模型。雷诺应力模型(RSM)也已评估。比RANS更先进的建模策略,即大涡模拟(LES)和区域LES(ZLES),也已经过测试。 URANS,LES和ZLES的验证结果表明,预测与基准数据的一致程度通常与其他人的工作一致。对于CPU情况,来自URANS,LES的流场和传热预测; ZLES和ZLES与测量值进行比较。总体而言,对于流场,ZLES和LES比URANS更准确。带状低雷诺数的URANS模型(使用墙面k-l模型)比高雷诺数的模型性能更好。但是,对于传热预测,所研究的低雷诺数模型都没有表现良好。

著录项

  • 作者

    Liu Yan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号