首页> 外文OA文献 >To what degree have the non-police public services adopted the National Intelligence Model? : what benefits could the National Intelligence Model deliver?
【2h】

To what degree have the non-police public services adopted the National Intelligence Model? : what benefits could the National Intelligence Model deliver?

机译:非警察公共服务在多大程度上采用了国家情报模型? :国家情报模型可以带来哪些好处?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It is claimed that the National Intelligence Model (NIM) consolidated intelligence-led policing principles in investigative practice and decision making in British policing. Subsequently, encouraged by the Home Office, the NIM was adopted by a number of other public services with an investigative capability. However, that transfer took place without a sufficiently rigorous evaluation of the model’s value to the police service and without any meaningful analysis of its relevance to the investigative functions of other public sector agencies. This research examined the adoption of the NIM by three public sector bodies: The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), The Identity and Passport Service (IPS) and the Driving Standards Agency (DSA). It drew on archival materials, associated literature and the analysis of semi-structured interviews with the personnel of these and associated agencies. Research respondents also assessed a simplified version of the NIM that was designed to remove many of the original model’s inconsistencies and ambiguities. The research identified that the reviewed public services are not compliant with the NIM minimum standards and that the model has not delivered any meaningful improvement in the consistency of process, investigative efficiency, improved partnership working, or in fraud reduction in those agencies. The NIM failed because of perceived complexity, the language of the model and supplementary guidance; its exclusive ‘fit’ with the police; and a suspicion by the agencies’ personnel that its adoption was intended as a performance management and governance tool. Moreover, the revised version of the NIM’s minimum standards did not improve comprehension or conformity, or resolve the model’s perceived police bias. It was concluded that the model is not fit for purpose for the agencies studied and that an alternative model that is more finely tuned to the needs of those agencies is required.
机译:据称,国家情报模型(NIM)在英国警务的侦查实践和决策制定中整合了情报主导的警务原则。随后,在内政部的鼓励下,NIM被其他具有调查能力的其他公共服务机构采用。但是,这种转移是在没有对该模型对警察部门的价值进行充分严格评估的情况下进行的,并且没有对该模型与其他公共部门机构的调查职能的相关性进行任何有意义的分析。这项研究研究了三个公共部门机构对NIM的采用:工作和退休金部(DWP),身份和护照服务(IPS)以及驾驶标准局(DSA)。它利用了档案材料,相关文献以及对这些机构和相关机构人员进行的半结构式访谈的分析。研究对象还评估了NIM的简化版本,该版本旨在消除许多原始模型的不一致性和歧义。研究发现,经过审查的公共服务不符合NIM最低标准,并且该模型并未在流程的一致性,调查效率,改进的合作伙伴关系或这些机构的欺诈减少方面带来任何有意义的改善。 NIM失败了,原因是感知到的复杂性,模型的语言和补充指导;与警察的独家“配合”;代理商人员怀疑它的采用是为了作为绩效管理和治理工具。此外,NIM最低标准的修订版并未提高理解力或合规性,也未解决该模型对警察的偏见。得出的结论是,该模型不适合所研究机构的目的,因此需要一种更适合这些机构需求的替代模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Osborn Nick;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号