首页> 外文OA文献 >Outcrop and forward modelling analysis of ice-house cyclicity and reservoir lithologies
【2h】

Outcrop and forward modelling analysis of ice-house cyclicity and reservoir lithologies

机译:冰室周期性与储层岩性的露头正演模拟分析

摘要

Combined outcrop and forward modelling studies were employed to improve upon conceptual sequence stratigraphic models of carbonate platform facies architecture during ice-house climate periods. The studied outcrops were chosen to reflect carbonate deposition in a range of sedimentary basin types of similar age (Moscovian) the Paradox Basin (Utah, USA), the Orogrande Basin (New Mexico, USA) and the Moscow-Mezen Basin (Arkhangel'sk Oblast, Russia). Results of outcrop studies were compared and contrasted with results of a one-dimensional stratigraphic forward model, designed to incorporate and test likely controls on carbonate icehouse systems. Outcrop studies and microfacies interpretation of the Honaker Trail Section (Paradox Basin) reveals no evidence of a sedimentary hierarchy, despite previous interpretation. Existing qualitative conceptual models of a sedimentary hierarchy are found to be flawed and an improved quantitative definition of a sedimentary hierarchy is presented. Results of numerical forward modelling suggest that the existence of a rigorously identifiable sedimentary hierarchy in the stratigraphic record is highly improbable. Comparison of sedimentary stacking patterns between the Orogrande Basin, the Moscow-Mezen Basin and numerical simulations suggest that although sedimentary cyclicity is highly likely to be forced by glacio-eustatic sea-level oscillations, the stacking patterns and intra-cycle facies distributions are controlled primarily by subsidence regime of the basin. Generally, it can be said that the best reservoir facies (net-to-gross thickness of grainstone) development will occur in moderately to rapidly subsiding extensional basins and moderately subsiding foreland basins. The absence of peritidal facies within ice-house carbonate successions is a sedimentological distinction between ice-house and green-house periods. Numerical forward modelling reveals that peritidal facies are developed during ice-house periods but because of their position within accommodation cycles tend to have low preservation potential.
机译:结合露头和前向建模研究来改善冰屋气候时期碳酸盐台地相构造的概念层序地层学模型。选择研究露头是为了反映一系列年龄相似的沉积盆地(莫斯科),悖论盆地(美国犹他州),Orogrande盆地(美国新墨西哥)和莫斯科-梅岑盆地(阿尔汉格尔斯克)的碳酸盐沉积。俄罗斯的Oblast)。将露头研究的结果与一维地层正向模型的结果进行了比较和对比,该模型用于合并和测试碳酸盐冰屋系统的可能控制。尽管有先前的解释,但对洪纳克步道剖面(帕拉多克斯盆地)的露头研究和微相解释并没有发现沉积层次的证据。发现现有的沉积层次定性概念模型存在缺陷,并提出了改进的沉积层次定量定义。数值正演模拟的结果表明,在地层记录中存在严格可识别的沉积层次非常不可能。 Orogrande盆地,Moscow-Mezen盆地之间的沉积堆积模式和数值模拟的比较表明,尽管沉积周期性很可能是由冰川-海平面的海平面振荡所强迫的,但是堆积模式和周期内相分布是主要受控的通过盆地的沉降方式。通常,可以说最好的储层相(粒岩的净总厚度)发生在中度到快速沉降的伸展盆地和中度前陆盆地。在冰室碳酸盐岩演替过程中不存在蠕变相,这是冰室和温室时期之间的沉积学区别。数值正演模型揭示了围冰相在冰期期间发育,但是由于它们在适应周期内的位置往往具有较低的保存潜力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pollitt David A;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号