首页> 外文OA文献 >Students' approaches to mathematical tasks using software as a black-box, glass-box or open-box
【2h】

Students' approaches to mathematical tasks using software as a black-box, glass-box or open-box

机译:学生使用软件作为黑匣子,玻璃盒或开箱即可完成数学任务

摘要

Three mathematical software modes are investigated in this thesis: black-box software showing no mathematical steps; glass-box software showing the intermediate mathematical steps; and open-box software showing and allowing interaction at the intermediate mathematical steps. The glass-box and open-box software modes are often recommended over the black-box software to help understanding but there is limited research comparing all three. This research investigated students' performance and their approaches to solving three mathematical task types when assigned to the software boxes. Three approaches that students may undertake when solving the tasks were investigated: students' processing levels, their software exploration and their self-explanations. The effect of mathematics confidence on students' approaches and performance was also considered. Thirty-eight students were randomly assigned to one of the software boxes in an experimental design where all audio and video data were collected via a web-conference remote observation method. The students were asked to think-aloud whilst they solved three task types. The three task types were classified based on the level of conceptual and procedural knowledge needed for solving: mechanical tasks required procedural knowledge, interpretive tasks required conceptual knowledge; and constructive tasks used both conceptual and procedural knowledge. The results indicated that the relationship between students' approaches and performance varied with the software box. Students using the black-box software explored more for the constructive tasks than the students in the glass-box and open-box software. These black-box software students also performed better on the constructive tasks, particularly those with higher mathematics confidence. The open-box software appeared to encourage more mathematical explanations whilst the glass-box software encouraged more real-life explanations. Mathematically confident students were best able to appropriate the black-box software for their conceptual understanding. The glass-box software or open-box software appeared to be useful for helping students with procedural understanding and familiarity with mathematical terms.
机译:本文研究了三种数学软件模式:黑盒软件不显示任何数学步骤;玻璃盒软件,显示中间的数学步骤;以及在中间数学步骤中显示并允许进行交互的开放式软件。通常建议在黑盒软件上使用玻璃盒和开盒软件模式,以帮助理解,但是对这三种方法进行比较的研究很少。这项研究调查了学生的表现及其分配给软件盒时解决三种数学任务类型的方法。研究了学生解决任务时可能采取的三种方法:学生的处理水平,他们的软件探索和自我解释。还考虑了数学自信心对学生的学习方式和表现的影响。在实验设计中,将38名学生随机分配到其中一个软件盒中,该软件中的所有音频和视频数据都是通过网络会议远程观察方法收集的。在解决三种任务类型的同时,要求学生思考。根据解决所需的概念和程序知识的级别对三种任务类型进行了分类:机械任务需要程序知识,解释性任务需要概念知识;和建设性的任务同时使用概念和程序知识。结果表明,学生的学习态度与表现之间的关系随软件盒的不同而不同。使用黑盒软件的学生比从事玻璃盒和开放盒软件的学生对建设性任务的探索更多。这些黑盒子软件的学生在建设性任务上也表现得更好,尤其是那些对数学充满信心的学生。开放框软件似乎鼓励更多的数学解释,而玻璃框软件则鼓励更多的现实解释。数学上有信心的学生最有能力在他们的概念理解上采用黑盒软件。玻璃箱软件或开箱软件似乎对帮助学生具有程序上的理解和对数学术语的熟悉很有用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hosein Anesa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号