首页> 外文OA文献 >Influencia de la discapacidad intelectual (DI) en la capacidad de los jugadores de baloncesto para resolver una situación de juego: hacia los sistemas de clasificación basados en la evidencia en baloncesto- DI
【2h】

Influencia de la discapacidad intelectual (DI) en la capacidad de los jugadores de baloncesto para resolver una situación de juego: hacia los sistemas de clasificación basados en la evidencia en baloncesto- DI

机译:智力残疾(DI)对篮球运动员解决比赛情况能力的影响:对篮球运动中基于证据的分类系统 - DI

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Basketball for athletes with intellectual impairment (II) requires the development of evidence-based eligibility systems to guarantee that only athletes with significant limitations performing basketball participate in these competitions. In addition, this is needed to re-include II-basketball in the Paralympic program. To do this, it is required to investigate how II impacts on fundamental basketball activities. To address this need, the aim of this study was to compare able-bodied (AB) and II-players ́ capacity to solve a game situation. A field test was designed ad hoc in which 38 elite II-players from France, Portugal, Australia and Japan who participated in the Global Games (2015) and 38 AB-basketball players competing in Spanish competitions, had to solve 8 standardized game situations. Results indicated that II-players spent significantly (p≤0.05) more time to decide (0.92±0.2s) than AB-players (0.63±0.1s) and to execute the solution (II: 3.01±0.4s; AB: 2.56±0.3s). Also, II-players made more rule infractions (II: 7.11±1.4; AB: 7.71±0.7), more feints (II: 1.37±1.4; AB: 0.3±0.6), more dribbles (II: 15.08±3.9; AB: 12.29±2.3) and they performed less successful solutions (II: 4.42±1.5; AB: 5.39±1.3). However, no differences were found in number of correct decisions made. Decision time, number of dribbles and situations in which they succeeded werethe variables that best discriminated between II and AB-players. These results confirmed the negative influence of II on players ́ capacity to solve a basketball game situation. The calculated discriminant function let us establish the minimum scores from this test that indicates significant limitations on the capacity to solve a game situation. These scores are applicable to determine eligibility criteria in II-basketball worldwide.
机译:智力障碍运动员的篮球(II)要求开发基于证据的资格制度,以确保只有表现严重缺陷的运动员才能参加篮球比赛。另外,需要将II篮球重新纳入残奥会计划。为此,需要研究II对基础篮球活动的影响。为了满足这一需求,本研究的目的是比较健全(AB)和II级玩家解决游戏情况的能力。临时设计了现场测试,其中来自法国,葡萄牙,澳大利亚和日本的38名II级精英选手参加了2015年全球运动会,以及38名参加西班牙比赛的AB篮球选手必须解决8种标准比赛情况。结果表明,与AB玩家(0.63±0.1s)和执行解决方案(II:3.01±0.4s; AB:2.56±)相比,II玩家在决定(0.92±0.2s)上花费的时间(p≤0.05)多得多(p≤0.05) 0.3秒)。此外,II级玩家犯规次数更多(II:7.11±1.4; AB:7.71±0.7),更多假(II:1.37±1.4; AB:0.3±0.6),运球更多(II:15.08±3.9; AB: 12.29±2.3),他们执行的解决方案不太成功(II:4.42±1.5; AB:5.39±1.3)。但是,在正确决策的数量上没有发现差异。决定时间,运球次数和成功的情况是最能区分II和AB玩家的变量。这些结果证实了II对球员解决篮球比赛状况的能力的负面影响。计算出的判别函数使我们可以从该测试中建立最低分数,这表明解决游戏情况的能力受到了明显限制。这些分数适用于确定全球II-篮球的资格标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号