首页> 外文OA文献 >Card versus cash: empirical evidence of the impact of payment card interchange fees on end users’ choice of payment methods
【2h】

Card versus cash: empirical evidence of the impact of payment card interchange fees on end users’ choice of payment methods

机译:卡与现金:支付卡交换费对最终用户选择支付方式的影响的经验证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Interchange fees in card payments are a mechanism to balance costs and revenues between banks for the joint provision of payment services. However, such fees represent a relevant input cost used as a reference price for the final fee charged to the merchants, who may be reluctant to accept cards and induce the cardholder to withdraw cash. In this paper, we empirically verify for the first time the effect of the interchange fee on the decision to withdraw cash and compare it with that of paying with payment cards, considering a balanced panel data set of Italian issuing banks. Finally, results show that there is a positive correlation between the cash usage and the level of the interchange fees. Accordingly, regulation of the multilateral interchange fee level may be an effective tool in reducing cash payments at the point of sale, although there is no clear evidence that a zero interchange fee rate (or a close-to-zero rate) would be optimal.
机译:卡支付中的交换费是一种在银行之间为联合提供支付服务而平衡成本和收入的机制。但是,这些费用代表相关的输入成本,用作向商家收取的最终费用的参考价格,商家可能不愿接受卡并诱使持卡人提取现金。在本文中,我们考虑了意大利发卡银行的均衡面板数据集,首次通过实证检验了交换费对现金提取决策的影响,并将其与使用支付卡付款的决策进行了比较。最后,结果表明,现金使用量和交换费水平之间存在正相关。因此,对多边交换费水平的监管可能是减少销售点现金支付的有效工具,尽管没有明确的证据表明零交换费率(或接近零率)是最佳的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ardizzi Guerino;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号