首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing forecasts of Latvia's GDP using simple seasonal ARIMA models and direct versus indirect approach
【2h】

Comparing forecasts of Latvia's GDP using simple seasonal ARIMA models and direct versus indirect approach

机译:使用简单的季节性aRIma模型和直接与间接方法比较拉脱维亚GDp的预测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper contributes to the literature by comparing predictive accuracy of one-period real-time simple seasonal ARIMA forecasts of Latvia's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as well as by comparing a direct forecast of Latvia's GDP versus three kinds of indirect forecasts. Four main results are as follows. Direct forecast of Latvia's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) seems to yield better precision than an indirect one. AR(1) model tends to give more precise forecasts than the benchmark moving-average models. An extra regular differencing appears to help better forecast Latvia's GDP in an economic downturn. Finally, only AR(1) gives forecasts with better precision compared to a naive Random Walk model.
机译:本文通过比较拉脱维亚国内生产总值(GDP)的单周期实时,季节性ARIMA预测的预测准确性,以及将拉脱维亚GDP的直接预测与三种间接预测进行比较,为文献做出了贡献。四个主要结果如下。对拉脱维亚国内生产总值的直接预测似乎比间接预测的精度更高。与基准移动平均模型相比,AR(1)模型倾向于给出更精确的预测。在经济低迷时期,额外的常规差异似乎可以更好地预测拉脱维亚的GDP。最后,与单纯的随机游走模型相比,只有AR(1)可以提供更好的预测精度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bušs Ginters;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号