首页> 外文OA文献 >Appropriability of Technical Innovations: An Empirical Analysis
【2h】

Appropriability of Technical Innovations: An Empirical Analysis

机译:技术创新的专用性:实证分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Appropriating the economic returns from technical innovations is very important for individual inventors and innovators, as well as for technical change in individual markets and for the whole economy. Since appropriability is difficult to measure directly, many researchers have been trying to investigate it indirectly and qualitatively by examining the effectiveness of various means of appropriability. The most important of these means are patents, secrecy and lead time and related advantages.The purpose of this paper is to investigate empirically the effectiveness of different means of protecting the competitive advantages of technical innovations in Switzerland. The analysis is based on a survey conducted in 1988 among 358 Swiss experts, mainly R&D executives from selected firms. They represented 127 different lines of business, mainly in the manufacturing sector. The results can be summarized as follows:1. For process innovations lead time is generally considered as the most effective means of appropnability. For product innovations superior sales and service efforts are viewed as the most effective means, followed by lead time.2. For both product and process innovations patents are generally considered to be the least effective means of appropriability.3. Patents as a means of appropnability in the Swiss context are only effective in a few industries: in chemicals, including drugs, and in some cases in the machinery and electrotechnics industries.4. The ability of competitors to "invent around" patented innovations and the perception that patent documents require "disclosure of too much information" are considered as the most important constraints on the effectiveness of patents.5. Inventors and innovators have manifold reasons for patenting their new ideas. Although patents may not provide adequate protection against imitation, they can contribute to enhancing the patent-holders' negotiating position towards third parties. This can be the case in negotiations either with other firms (for example about R&D-related agreements, fusions, take-overs etc) or with governmental agencies (for example concerning access to foreign markets).
机译:适当地利用技术创新的经济回报对于个人发明家和创新者以及个人市场和整个经济的技术变革都非常重要。由于适当性难以直接衡量,因此许多研究人员一直试图通过研究各种适当性手段的有效性来进行间接和定性的调查。这些手段中最重要的是专利,保密和交付周期以及相关优势。本文的目的是实证研究保护瑞士技术创新竞争优势的各种手段的有效性。该分析基于1988年对358名瑞士专家进行的调查,这些专家主要是选定公司的研发主管。他们代表了127个不同的业务部门,主要在制造业中。研究结果概括如下:1。对于流程创新,提前期通常被认为是最有效的可分配性手段。对于产品创新而言,卓越的销售和服务努力被认为是最有效的手段,其次是交货时间2。对于产品和过程创新,专利通常被认为是最不合理的挪用手段。3。在瑞士,专利作为一种可分配性手段仅在以下几个行业中有效:化学制品,包括药品,在某些情况下,在机械和电子工业中。4。竞争者“发明”专利创新的能力以及专利文件需要“披露太多信息”的观念被认为是对专利效力的最重要限制。5。发明者和创新者有多种理由申请新思想。尽管专利可能无法提供足够的保护以防仿制,但是它们可以有助于增强专利持有人与第三方的谈判地位。与其他公司(例如,与研发相关的协议,合并,收购等)或与政府机构(例如,与进入外国市场有关)进行谈判时,可能就是这种情况。

著录项

  • 作者

    Harabi Najib;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1994
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:06:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号