首页> 外文OA文献 >Overseas Acquisition versus Greenfield Foreign Investment: Which Internationalization Strategy is better for Indian Pharmaceutical Enterprises?
【2h】

Overseas Acquisition versus Greenfield Foreign Investment: Which Internationalization Strategy is better for Indian Pharmaceutical Enterprises?

机译:海外收购与绿地外商投资:哪种国际化战略对印度制药企业更好?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Very recently overseas acquisition and outward greenfield foreign investment have emerged as the two important modes of internationalization of the Indian pharmaceutical enterprises. This study examines the relative strengths and weaknesses of these strategies so as to suggest which between the two is a more effective internationalization strategy for the Indian pharmaceutical firms, given the nature of their ownership advantages. This analysis has been conducted in three stages. First, the nternationalization process of the Indian pharmaceutical industry has been embedded into a four stage theory emphasizing on the emergence of different modes of internationalization like inward foreign investment, imports, exports, outward greenfield investment, overseas acquisition and contract manufacturing including inter-firm strategic alliances. Second, theoretical perspectives have been developed with regard to the different ways in which greenfield investment and overseas acquisition can maximize the revenue productivity of pharmaceutical firms’ competitive advantages and/or to strengthen their competitive position. Third, case study of Ranbaxy Laboratories has been undertaken to empirically assess its experience with overseas acquisitions. The analysis indicates that the growth and internationalization of Indian pharmaceutical enterprises was critically dependent upon strategic government policies pursued in the past. The Indian experience offers a number of policy lessons to other developing countries wanting to build their domestic base in the pharmaceutical sector. Theoretical understandings indicate that acquisition is a more effective internationalization strategy than greenfield investment since the former not only provides all the benefits that the latter gives, but also several other competitive advantages important for firms’ performance in world market. The experience of Ranbaxy shows that overseas acquisitions have augmented its intangible asset bundle including distribution and market networks and have provided access to an existing market.
机译:最近,海外收购和对外绿地投资已成为印度制药企业国际化的两种重要方式。这项研究考察了这些策略的相对优势和劣势,以鉴于印度制药公司所有权优势的性质,建议两者之间哪个是印度制药公司更有效的国际化战略。该分析已分三个阶段进行。首先,印度制药业的国际化进程已被嵌入到一个四阶段理论中,该理论强调出现了不同的国际化模式,例如对内投资,进口,出口,对绿地投资,海外收购和包括企业间战略在内的合同制造。联盟。其次,关于绿地投资和海外收购可以最大限度地提高制药公司的竞争优势和/或加强其竞争地位的收入的方式,已经有了理论观点。第三,已经对Ranbaxy实验室进行了案例研究,以实证评估其在海外收购方面的经验。分析表明,印度制药企业的成长和国际化严重依赖于过去奉行的战略政府政策。印度的经验为希望在制药行业建立国内基地的其他发展中国家提供了许多政策课程。理论上的理解表明,与绿地投资相比,收购是一种更有效的国际化战略,因为前者不仅提供了后者带来的所有好处,而且还提供了对企业在世界市场上的表现至关重要的其他一些竞争优势。 Ranbaxy的经验表明,海外收购扩大了其无形资产捆绑,包括分销和市场网络,并提供了进入现有市场的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号