首页> 外文OA文献 >Openness and competitiveness of manufacturing sector: a comparative study of China and India
【2h】

Openness and competitiveness of manufacturing sector: a comparative study of China and India

机译:制造业的开放性和竞争力:中国与印度的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

FDI may affect the supply of productive resources including (financial capital, equipment and machinery, technology, management and etc.). FDI creates employment where unemployment and underemployment rate is high and thus increases the income of the workers. As a result an additional savings to the host country is created. FDI also has the backward effect. Through buying locally made materials and intermediate goods it creates a good environment for the locally produced goods. For China, the competitiveness of manufacturing sector and Trade Openness are increasing over the year since 1991. However, the Financial Openness of China is showing mixed result, it increased until mid-1990s and it is showing the declining trend. In case of India, the picture is so complex. The Competitiveness of manufacturing sector and Financial Openness are showing the fluctuating path over the year. No as such trend can be found for these two series for India. Only the Trade Openness is showing increasing trend for India.
机译:外国直接投资可能会影响生产资源的供应,包括(金融资本,设备和机械,技术,管理等)。外国直接投资在失业率和就业不足率高的地方创造就业机会,从而增加了工人的收入。结果,为东道国创造了额外的节省。外国直接投资也有向后效应。通过购买本地制造的材料和中间产品,它为本地生产的商品创造了良好的环境。对于中国而言,自1991年以来,制造业的竞争力和贸易开放度一直在增长。然而,中国的金融开放度却表现出好坏参半,一直持续到1990年代中期,并且呈下降趋势。以印度为例,情况是如此复杂。制造业竞争力和金融开放度显示出一年来的波动路径。在印度这两个系列中找不到这种趋势。仅贸易开放性对印度显示出增长的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号