首页> 外文OA文献 >Liquidation in the Face of Adversity: Stealth Vs. Sunshine Trading, Predatory Trading Vs. Liquidity Provision
【2h】

Liquidation in the Face of Adversity: Stealth Vs. Sunshine Trading, Predatory Trading Vs. Liquidity Provision

机译:面对逆境中的清算:隐形对比阳光交易,掠夺性交易比。流动资金准备金

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We consider a multi-player situation in an illiquid market in which one player tries to liquidate a large portfolio in a short time span, while some competitors know of the seller's intention and try to make a pro¯t by trading in this market over a longer time horizon. We show that the liquidity characteristics, the number of competitors in the market and their trading time horizons determine the optimal strategy for the competitors: they either provide liquidity to the seller, or they prey on her by simultaneous selling. Depending on the expected competitor behavior, it might be sensible for the seller to pre-announce a trading intention (sunshine trading") or to keep it secret (stealthtrading").
机译:我们考虑了在一个流动性不佳的市场中的多玩家情况,其中一个玩家试图在短时间内清算大量投资组合,而一些竞争者知道卖方的意图,并试图通过在这个市场上进行交易来获利。更长的时间范围。我们表明,流动性特征,市场中竞争者的数量及其交易时间范围决定了竞争者的最佳策略:他们要么向卖方提供流动性,要么通过同时出售来掠夺卖方。根据预期的竞争对手行为,对于卖方而言,预先宣布交易意图(“阳光交易”)或对其保密(“秘密交易”)可能是明智的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号