首页> 外文OA文献 >Fees and the efficiency of tradable permit systems: an experimental approach
【2h】

Fees and the efficiency of tradable permit systems: an experimental approach

机译:费用和可交易许可证制度的效率:一种实验方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The paper presents the results of an economic experiment in which the effects of fees on allocative efficiency of tradable utilization permits (e.g. pollution permits) are explored. Laboratory subjects (university students) play the roles of firms whose generic product requires a specific input or permits. Scarcity is exogenously introduced by a fixed supply of tradable production permits. Three treatments are compared: A) no fee imposed; B) a fixed tax per permit; C) partial retraction of permits which are reissued by auction. We regard B and C as two ways of imposing fees. Our results indicate that, after controlling for deviation of permit prices from a prediction based on fundamentals, fees have an impact on distribution of permits. Interestingly, a fixed tax enhances efficiency compared to the case of no fees, while retraction and reallocation by auction reduces efficiency compared to both alternative treatments. Apparently, subjects’ decision making is affected by the imposition of fees, but it matters how such costs are presented or framed.
机译:本文介绍了一项经济实验的结果,其中探讨了费用对可交易利用许可(例如污染许可)的分配效率的影响。实验科目(大学学生)扮演的公司的通用产品需要特定的投入或许可。固定供应可交易的生产许可证是外来的短缺。比较了三种治疗方法:A)不收取任何费用; B)每张许可证收取固定税; C)通过拍卖重新签发的许可证的部分撤回。我们将B和C视为两种收费方式。我们的结果表明,在控制许可证价格与基于基本面的预测之间的偏差之后,费用会对许可证的分配产生影响。有趣的是,与不收取费用的情况相比,固定税提高了效率,而与两种替代方法相比,通过拍卖收回和重新分配均降低了效率。显然,受检者的决定会受到费用的影响,但如何呈报或确定费用至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号