首页> 外文OA文献 >Reform, Reform the Reforms or Simply Regression? The Washington Consensus' and its Critics
【2h】

Reform, Reform the Reforms or Simply Regression? The Washington Consensus' and its Critics

机译:改革,改革改革或简单回归?华盛顿共识及其批评者

摘要

The 'Washington Consensus' analysis and policies are being disputed both analytically and for their effectiveness.This paper surveys first the debate on the definition of the 'Washington Consensus' vis-a-vis its apparent developmental shortcomings. Then it surveys the major areas where the 'Washington Consensus' isjudged as a failure (with articularemphasis on the crises of the 1990s).In the next part it presents the main responses to the 'crisis' of the 'Washington Consensus'. Its supporters are categorised in tre fundamentalists and the reformists whereas itsopponents are divided in the post-Washington Consensus adherents and the Marxist critics. It is argued that the Marxist perspective offers a superior understanding and critique of the 'Washington Consensus'.
机译:“华盛顿共识”的分析和政策在分析和有效性方面都存在争议。本文首先针对“华盛顿共识”的定义,针对其明显的发展缺陷进行了辩论。然后,它调查了将``华盛顿共识''判定为失败的主要领域(重点是1990年代的危机)。在下一部分中,它提出了对``华盛顿共识''的``危机''的主要回应。它的支持者分为三大原教旨主义者和改良主义者,而反对者则分为《华盛顿后共识》的拥护者和马克思主义者。有人认为,马克思主义的观点对“华盛顿共识”提供了更好的理解和批判。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号